Laurence Lockton
My feedback
19 results found
-
259 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Laurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Hello,
We have received the mapping for the discovery metadata for the general SDGO collection, and it will be added by November 2023.
Please be advised that currently there is no way for us to map the SDGO sub-collections, because the chapters and articles CDI metadata does not contain any tags to match them to the sub-collections.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Laurence Lockton
shared this idea
·
-
29 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Laurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
This is in development as part of the 2024 NERS enhancement process: 8530 (Prevent multiple requests from a same borrowing library within a short period of time)
Thanks!
-Mike
Laurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Laurence Lockton
commented
Similarly we'd like more flexibility in the Digitization and Copyright Rules to be able to block borrowing requests for multiple digital chapters from the same book so we can convert it to a request for the whole physical book. It seems that for borrowing requests, the rules only really support the CONTU Guidelines Rule of Five. The Rapido copyright rules has a "Number of Requests Per User on Specific Resource" parameter, which sounds useful if it was in the Alma rules.
-
33 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
133 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
275 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Laurence Lockton
commented
How to prevent emails from Ex Libris products being marked as suspicious:
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Cross-Product/Knowledge_Articles/How_to_prevent_emails_from_Ex_Libris_products_being_marked_as_suspicious
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/050Administration/050Configuring_General_Alma_Functions/070Configuring_Alma_Letters#Configuring_Outgoing_Email -
47 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesLaurence Lockton
shared this idea
·
-
26 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesLaurence Lockton
shared this idea
·
-
37 votes
Hello,
We are currently working with the provider to determine if we can ingest this content for Discovery as well as for Alma enrichment.
Thank you,
RaelLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
75 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
147 votes
There has been related development since this idea was first posted. It is now possible to use the Reading List Citation Update Task to Synchronize Citations with Repository, including an option to handle citations that are linked to deleted bibliographic records (delete or detach citation). The job can also be run in report mode. As of the May 2024 release it is possible to schedule the job to run on a regular basis. We believe this resolves this idea, but please test and let us know if otherwise.
Laurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
-
208 votesLaurence Lockton
shared this idea
·
-
80 votesLaurence Lockton
supported this idea
·
It woud be useful to be able to specify a separate reply to address, i.e. one that goes in a Reply-to: header, so that Out of Office replies go to the From: address, which doesn't need any action by staff, whereas human replies to the Reply-to: address for a ticketing system, for example.
Every month we have to delete lots of tickets for out of office replies to Borrowing Activity Letters, so it would be easier if these could go into a separate mailbox to be deleted in bulk.