Skip to content

Wendy Robertson

My feedback

32 results found

  1. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    This would be very helpful, especially if researchers could add their own media mentions - see https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/929326-esploro/suggestions/46330147-allow-researchers-to-add-their-own-media-mentions

  2. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    Grants can be added by researchers when they deposit an asset. It isn't quite the same as being able to add a grant on its own but it does get to partial functionality. However, when researchers have done this, I have needed to recreate the grant correctly, so I would prefer if this was an option an institution could choose to turn on or not. The media mentions definitely should be something a researcher can add on their own (along with connecting a media mention to an asset - https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/929326-esploro/suggestions/44804317-link-media-mention-to-asset )

  3. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    The URLs above no longer work - https://ndltd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/etd-ms-v1.1.html

    Specifically what we need is similar to what we should have with qualified DC:
    dc.title.alternative
    dc.title translated
    dc.description.abstract
    dc.description.note
    dc.description.release
    dc.publisher.country
    dc.contributor.role
    Plus these etd specific fields
    thesis.degree.name
    thesis.degree.level
    thesis.degree.discipline
    thesis.degree.grantor

    If all of this was in QDC we could map to this format

    See also https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/929326-esploro/suggestions/42241477

    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  5. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    We need to have the student's name visible in the brief list. If that name doesn't display all we see is the person on whose profile the etd is listed and we already no that name so it is of no use. Faculty members want to easily see a list of WHO they advised with a link to their dissertation. Easily seeing the student's name is a critical part of this.

    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    It would be really nice if this could move forward. it will be incredible helpful for abstracts at the same conference. We have a staff member who will be adding a lot of Engineering abstracts for things that are not in CDI, nor indexed elsewhere that we can find, and have poor metadata in their pages so we cannot pull them into a reference manager and then output in RIS or Bibtex

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    I completely agree with Bec. A few additional specifics on the parent publication are place of publication, series, and series number.

    Wendy Robertson supported this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  8. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    An "Other" under publications would help (example) https://iro.uiowa.edu/esploro/outputs/9983557326202771 but we would also need to have the resource sub-type display more prominently. It is buried in the details section. It is not available as a facet. It does not display in the brief view. It has not impact on the broad resource type at the very top (to the left of open access). We need more information displayed prominently both in the research portal and on profiles.

    See also https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/929326-esploro/suggestions/45982750-enable-more-esploro-metadata-fields-to-be-facetabl

    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  9. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    It would great to have the same functionality on a researcher profile that is requested for the portal on https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/929326/suggestions/44147037

  10. 38 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    I hope this will have the same (or better) functionality as in Primo, where you can export in a variety of formats, including email, Bibtex, RIS, and Excel.

  11. 31 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This Idea is very broad, and since it was opened new functionality has been added, in particular the Update by CSV. CSV update covers all metadata fields in the Asset but does not include Authors, either creators or contributors, or Files. 

    It would be helpful to get an updated list of priorities.


    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 

    Bulk IMPORT allows adding multiple creators and contributors as well as files. Bulk EDITING lacks these features.

  12. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson supported this idea  · 
  13. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  14. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  15. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  16. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson shared this idea  · 
  17. 62 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wendy Robertson commented  · 
    Wendy Robertson supported this idea  · 
  18. 29 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson supported this idea  · 
  19. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson supported this idea  · 
  20. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wendy Robertson supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base