Chris Sloan
My feedback
21 results found
-
133 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
257 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
326 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
435 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
86 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
99 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
108 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
129 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
127 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
134 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
144 votes
Hello all,
Alma currently support publishing of a set of records with the enriched related records information. For more information please refer to Related Records Enrichment section (MARC only) section in the online help page.
Are you aware of this existing capability? Is this not sufficient for your needs?
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
83 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
19 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
666 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
206 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
148 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Sloan commented
Also, the field should be updateable by Alma bulk jobs and be represented in Analytics, or at least Alma search.
-
63 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
55 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
Chris Sloan shared this idea ·
-
38 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
80 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that this is currently not planned to be developed. We might evaluate it again in the future.
Therefore we are removing the "Under review" status for now.
Best regards,
Yael.
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
When Ex Libris decided to make the default for Publish to OCLC as "Publish", they also intended to do the same for Libraries Australia. However, We successfully argued that this was not the option that most Australian libraries would prefer. That's why it is the opposite from OCLC. This is from memory, as the change was made quite a long time ago, and I don't think may libraries worldwide were using the publish to OCLC option in Alma at that time (May 2015).