Chris Sloan
My feedback
26 results found
-
124 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
253 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
316 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
434 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
76 votes
Hello everyone,
I’d like to share our plans to introduce support for XSL (Extensible Stylesheet Language) normalization rules. This new feature is designed for handling complex normalization tasks. It offers the flexibility of a full programming language, enabling advanced data manipulation. This will complement our existing normalization rules based on DROOLS, maintaining all of its current capabilities.
Would the addition of this new type of normalization rule meet the requirements outlined in this idea?
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
86 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
99 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
102 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
126 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
127 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
134 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
146 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
149 votes
Hello all,
Alma currently support publishing of a set of records with the enriched related records information. For more information please refer to Related Records Enrichment section (MARC only) section in the online help page.
Are you aware of this existing capability? Is this not sufficient for your needs?
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
183 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
83 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
19 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
655 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
206 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
-
148 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Sloan commented
Also, the field should be updateable by Alma bulk jobs and be represented in Analytics, or at least Alma search.
-
63 votes
Chris Sloan supported this idea ·
When Ex Libris decided to make the default for Publish to OCLC as "Publish", they also intended to do the same for Libraries Australia. However, We successfully argued that this was not the option that most Australian libraries would prefer. That's why it is the opposite from OCLC. This is from memory, as the change was made quite a long time ago, and I don't think may libraries worldwide were using the publish to OCLC option in Alma at that time (May 2015).