Sally Smith
My feedback
16 results found
-
34 votesSally Smith supported this idea ·
-
13 votesSally Smith supported this idea ·
-
7 votesSally Smith supported this idea ·
-
22 votesSally Smith supported this idea ·
-
84 votesSally Smith supported this idea ·
-
15 votesSally Smith supported this idea ·
-
88 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to Thoth (with the address provided in the comment - thank you!), and will review the available metadata to evaluate our options.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Sally Smith supported this idea · -
42 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sally Smith supported this idea · -
52 votesSally Smith supported this idea ·
-
7 votesSally Smith shared this idea ·
-
13 votesSally Smith supported this idea ·
-
33 votesAdminTami Ezra (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
Sally Smith supported this idea · -
31 votesAdminTami Ezra (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
Sally Smith supported this idea · -
233 votes
Hello,
The content provider has paused the production of the metadata feed, we will reach out to them again in Q3 of 2024.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Sally Smith supported this idea · -
164 votes
Hi,
This is to update that this issue is still not planned to be developed in the current road map. We will continue to evaluate it for a future release.
Therefore we are keeping this under "Under review" status.
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment Sally Smith commentedAgree that this should not really be an enhancement request it should be possible out of the box. The documentation is misleading as it suggests that this data is handled separately - there are separate switches for each. We have just spent a long time switching off different ones to try and remove instructor information from the display only to find out that it's not possible to do that
Sally Smith supported this idea · -
53 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sally Smith commentedWe have had the same issue as this several times, both for electronic inventory and for print inventory.
Use case for portfolios is exactly as described above - moving groups of portfolios from an eba collection to a different local collection.
Our use case for print inventory was to create a set of Items in order to add notes at Item level from a Title set. We could only do this via a long-winded method of running a normalization rule to add a local field to the titles and then create an Item set using the local field as the query.
We would also like to create a set of inventory from a set using MMSIDs as well as ISBNs which seems as though it should more straight forward as they are unique and should easily map to the portfolios or items.Sally Smith supported this idea ·
Definitely needed - it is a waste of staff time having to deal with this manually in order to get the POL to close.