Ted Schwitzner

My feedback

27 results found

  1. 250 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello,

    This will require some development, since currently there is no automated way to identify the relevant information and add it to the portfolios.

    We will look into the development options we have, and will update once we have a timeline.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  2. 73 votes
    11 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ted Schwitzner commented  · 

    There are several shortcomings to the current model whereby these values are only visible via search results. In a consortium environment, the export to WorldCat tags at the institution and network work in concert with one another. Advanced search on the Tag Sync External Catalog value allows only the results in the institution being searched. Additionally, the Tag Sync value only accounts for records with an active lifecycle; the deleted repository has limited retrieval options that requires knowledge of the record IDs or user IDs involving deletion.

    When troubleshooting whether the data sync or any publication job has properly sent the records through, central office staff are already reviewing data using analytics. This is especially true for records deleted from the repository. The presence of the Export to WorldCat tag in analytics will give a clear picture in context of the other data present on the record at the time a record was added or deleted, without requiring the user to perform a separate search for the record or all records, or to review the record history in the metadata editor.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ted Schwitzner commented  · 

    Additionally, this value should be tracked in analytics on both the institution and network levels, as an NZ bibliographic record may have a different value than any IZ records.

    At the IZ:
    Bibliographic Details.Publish to External Catalog
    possible values: Publish bibliographic record, Publish holdings, Don't publish

    For records linked to the NZ:
    Bibliographic Details.Network Publish to External Catalog (similar to the Network ID field)
    possible values: Network Publish bibliographic record, Network Publish holdings, Network Don't publish

    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  3. 5 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner shared this idea  · 
  4. 133 votes
    6 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  5. 4 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ted Schwitzner commented  · 

    To elaborate on "Zone", this would be a column or filter that checks the import profile for the "Use Network Zone" value. If checked, filter/display as "Network"; if not checked, filter/display as "Institution"

    Ted Schwitzner shared this idea  · 
  6. 39 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  7. 28 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello,

    This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.

    It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.

    My sincere apologies.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  8. 11 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  9. 86 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  10. 22 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner shared this idea  · 
  11. 12 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner shared this idea  · 
  12. 12 votes
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner shared this idea  · 
  13. 10 votes
    0 comments  ·  Rialto » Ordering  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.

    Best,

    Heidi Whitehead

    Rialto Product Manager

    Ted Schwitzner shared this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner shared this idea  · 
  15. 30 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  16. 52 votes
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ted Schwitzner commented  · 

    Please also consider including the resource type, as that will allow libraries to create reports that clearly identify ebooks, journals, streaming media, etc.

    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  17. 34 votes
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ted Schwitzner commented  · 

    In addition to adding these fields as attributes to the bibliographic details dimension, it would be helpful to include an attribute, "Has Related Records" to the Title Details dimension of the subject area.

    See also the closed Idea https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/44425077-add-has-related-records-attribute-to-titles-subj

    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  18. 19 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  19. 14 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
  20. 84 votes
    6 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base