Ted Schwitzner
My feedback
29 results found
-
84 votesTed Schwitzner supported this idea ·
-
115 votes
Hello all,
While we are still working to reach a legal agreement with OverDrive to enable us to index their content in our CDI, we will be adding the OverDrive Magazine collections to our Knowledgebases.
Best,
Rael
Ted Schwitzner supported this idea · -
7 votesTed Schwitzner shared this idea ·
-
11 votesTed Schwitzner shared this idea ·
-
Add a new Bibliographic ID field for OCLC Control Number 035z to display each OCN one row per MMS ID
7 votesTed Schwitzner shared this idea · -
11 votesTed Schwitzner shared this idea ·
-
1 voteTed Schwitzner shared this idea ·
-
19 votesTed Schwitzner supported this idea ·
-
Add publication date and subject fields to 'Portfolio Details for Consortia Members' analytics table
45 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment Ted Schwitzner supported this idea · -
2 votesTed Schwitzner supported this idea ·
-
7 votesTed Schwitzner shared this idea ·
-
29 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ted Schwitzner commentedIn addition to adding these fields as attributes to the bibliographic details dimension, it would be helpful to include an attribute, "Has Related Records" to the Title Details dimension of the subject area.
Ted Schwitzner supported this idea · -
16 votesTed Schwitzner supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ted Schwitzner commentedThis alert may be avoided by adding a MARC Extension for the field to your MARC21 Bibliographic profile. I agree that this should be included by default by Ex Libris, as it is a ubiquitous need for mutual OCLC & Ex Libris Customers.
-
11 votesTed Schwitzner shared this idea ·
-
7 votesTed Schwitzner shared this idea ·
-
14 votesTed Schwitzner supported this idea ·
-
81 votesTed Schwitzner supported this idea ·
-
2 votesTed Schwitzner supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Ted Schwitzner commentedAlternatively, if displaying all is not practical, provide a filter box to jump to the correct section of the list. And also have screen refresh to the portion of the list that the user admin was editing, rather than resetting to the top of the list.
-
8 votesTed Schwitzner supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Ted Schwitzner commentedWe get requests along these lines from library staff who do not have user manager or circulation manager roles. Specifically, they click the User Details link under the User Menu on the persistent menu, expecting to either review their personal data or review their active roles. Instead, they get a page that says they're not allowed to view the data.
These staff don't need to modify the data directly, but being able to review their data is useful. Otherwise, why provide a "User Details" link if there's no ability to actually view those details?
Please also consider including the resource type, as that will allow libraries to create reports that clearly identify ebooks, journals, streaming media, etc.