Ann-Louise
My feedback
18 results found
-
28 votes
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
281 votes
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
129 votes
Hi all,
We would like to update that this is planned to be developed in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface plans can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
476 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
426 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
143 votes
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
170 votes
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
121 votes
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
44 votes
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
70 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ann-Louise commented
This letter also requires a message option for cancelled orders.
i.e. iv) Message (three set text options).Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
113 votes
We are reviewing this idea but we need more information. Please share some scenarios in which a user would export reading lists in bulk. Please include which users and in which situations. Thank you.
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
659 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
364 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ann-Louise commented
Has this improvement ever been in the NERS-voting? If not, maybe it's about time. As long as it doesn't "steal" all the complexity points. :-D
An error occurred while saving the comment Ann-Louise commented
Are there any progress on the planned solution? Any updates?
-
71 votes
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
80 votes
In order to support this, RESTful APIs to manage the XSL templates would be added to our set of APIs for configuration related entities
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
157 votes
Ann-Louise supported this idea ·
-
397 votes
Hi,
An approach we’ll be looking at is that an optional ‘Last Interest Period’ request policy will, if set, be used to set a default the last interest date (Primo and Alma). This way every request will have a last interest date set by the policy and overridable by the patron.
An error occurred while saving the comment Ann-Louise commented
With the new functionality for Not Needed After in Alma/Primo (May release 2021), customers are already starting to ask for this field to be mandatory in the Hold request form. It is possible to set as mandatory in the Resource Sharing Form. Will we see this option in the Hold Request Form customization as well?
-
4 votes
Ann-Louise shared this idea ·
Has this idea any estimate for when it will be developed and set into production?