Ann-Louise
My feedback
10 results found
-
285 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The difference from option 1 is that when an item…
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
321 votes
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
164 votes
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
211 votes
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
155 votes
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
44 votes
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
115 votes
We are reviewing this idea but we need more information. Please share some scenarios in which a user would export reading lists in bulk. Please include which users and in which situations. Thank you.
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
Ann-Louise
supported this idea
·
This letter also requires a message option for cancelled orders.
i.e. iv) Message (three set text options).