Maxime (SLSP)
My feedback
20 results found
-
256 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea · -
163 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
181 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
102 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
155 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
243 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
11 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
85 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
82 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
79 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
25 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
51 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
27 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
105 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
163 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
83 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
52 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
-
230 votes
Dear community,
Thanks for this idea.
I would like to make sure that we fully understand the use case:
1 The need is to allow users to change the currency for PO lines which were packaged and sent.
Can you please specify the statuses in which this is needed?
2 Upon such change, funding should be handled: disencumbrance for the original encumbered amount, and a new encumbrance on the fund with the new amount and currency. Is this correct?
3 The POL should be removed from the original PO, and re-packed. Is this correct?
4 Should the order be sent to the vendor again?
Thanks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product
Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea · -
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
659 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea · -
47 votesMaxime (SLSP) supported this idea ·
Dear Tamara
To my mind, all 3 options would be very useful.
If only one was to be implemented my preference is number 1.
Thank you
Kind regards
Maxime