Skip to content

Maxime (SLSP)

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

16 results found

  1. Make it easier to re-order Primo display details in Full Record Services

    36 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  2. Enable authority Record Enrichment in Primo VE on local subject fields

    69 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  3. Un-receive option for items not in-department with interested users.

    28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Acquisitions - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  4. OpenURL resolving - BaseURL configurable for extension to consortial network

    51 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  5. advanced option in Invoice search.

    26 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Acquisition - Invoices  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  6. Add more fields to the Update PO lines information & Update POLs Advanced jobs

    108 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  7. Reset PO and POL number every year

    320 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Under Review  ·  AdminNoam Fass (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Dear community, thanks for sharing this idea. To clarify, from the description of the idea, it looks like the need os to have the sequence restart in the beginning of the calendar year and not have any relation to the institution FY. 

    The suggested solution will be applied as described in this idea; At the start of each year, the sequence of the previous year will stop and starts again with indication of the new year.
    The first PO of 2023 of would be PO-2023-1, same with the POLs POL-2023-1.

    Important note:


    • This functionality is activated by a customer parameter controlled by the institutions (Acquisitions) - by default the CP should be false
    • The new numbering will begin when ever the Customer Parameter was enabled, even if it is in the middle of the calendar year.
    • Any existing PO/PO line numbers will not be changed, when the functionality is enabled…
    Maxime (SLSP) shared this idea  · 

  8. ShareDigitalResources parameter to allow individual settings

    37 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  9. Improve Alma Job Reports for Failed Record

    482 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    25 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  10. Item policy translations

    109 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  11. Results for e-resources when narrowing down to IZ

    158 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  12. Increase the number of local fields for search and facets

    52 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  13. Improve the search for non-preferred terms

    47 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  14. Change currency in the order

    197 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  15. Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation

    561 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

  16. Label distribution per row

    46 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Maxime (SLSP) supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)