In the consortial environment, we would like to take advantage of the new functionality of central NZ-activation (network zone) of e-collections working with IMGrs (inventory management groups). We have some institutions (not all IZs) which would like to work with IMGrs, some not, those who do, some do use campuses others do not.

We would like to see in Primo VE the distinction per campus also for databases and for non-suppressed e-collections (if used), as it works for portfolios so to better guide the end-user which collection would be the one to use.

If an IZ uses IMGr in Alma which are applied to campuses/library to distribute access for their e-collections, or if e-collections are centrally activated in the NZ, with IMGr, i.e. if a database or e-collection with portfolios in a consortial environment are centrally activated, and the e-collections are then visible in the Primo VE of the IZ, we would like to have an option which allows to display separately per campus the unsuppressed e-collections and databases in Primo VE. This should also be possible in the future NDE.

Display of portfolios per campus must stay as today, i.e. display per campus, and be valid for portfolios of suppressed or unsuppressed e-collections.
Please note that several Idea Exchanges on the topic was already brought up, but many of these Idea Exchanges were not retained due to lack of votes.

This Idea Exchange is addressed in particular to consortial architectures who work with the new functionality to centrally activate e-collections and apply IMGrs to these in the NZ. Yet the feature of campus display for unsuppressed e-collections should be available also for e-collections which are not IZ activated.

An idea for expected display and relevant status quo can be found in the attached file.