Lisa Wilczak
My feedback
11 results found
-
12 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. Please also reach out to EBSCO and let them know you'd be interested in this capability in Rialto.
The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Wilczak commented
A specific field to indicate a hold on a purchase request would be extremely helpful and would eliminate errors. Currently, we are manually adding the hold request in the Requester Notes field and then, again, manually adding the hold to the PO.
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
259 votes
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
162 votes
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Wilczak commented
An 'Archive' tab would be extremely helpful for management of completed purchase requests. We would delete them, however deletion prevents functional analytics reporting.
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
50 votes
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
96 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Wilczak commented
I would also like to see this feature implemented.
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Wilczak commented
Cost per use reports by fund that include Electronic Collection – Subscriptions would make a huge difference in our reporting. At this time, we have to add these subscriptions by hand. This information is in Alma, but it is not retrievable in Analytics.
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
194 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Wilczak commented
Yes, please. We do not want the purchase request service for journals or articles. Thank you.
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
131 votes
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
-
203 votes
Lisa Wilczak supported this idea ·
A more robust form would really be helpful. We are now using PR for replacements, and a check box for replacements would simplify our process substantially. The check would 1) notify the assigned reviewer that the PR is a replacement, and 2) notify staff to update/withdraw the record linked to the approved/rejected PR.