Ann-Louise

My feedback

  1. 97 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  2. 201 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  5. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  6. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  8. 198 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Hi Moshe,
    Yes, it would make sense. For us, as already stated, especially the publication date is essential. I believe the user who created the res sha req then will be registered as interested user, and receives the interested in letter, if activated?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Hi, Moshe
    Sorry for the delayed answer. On our part the type of patron is irrelevant. We try to have the same level of service to all our patrons. Other institutions may prefer a more differentiated level of service here, I guess.

    Rules that would automatically transform a rs req into a purch req makes sense. The important thing is to keep track of history, so we know that this started as a rs req, in case we deny the purch req and prefer to make a ILL instead. Or we like to do both.

    Thanks,
    Ann-Louise

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    If the request is held back with status "ready to be sent", like it does with material self ownership=true, then we can approve sending manually.

    Ann-Louise shared this idea  · 
  9. 244 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise shared this idea  · 
  10. 515 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thank you for suggesting this idea, the direction is to enable customers to show more links and offer some configuration options to set preferences.

    Note that this is not something that we can do in the near future since it is a complex change.

    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  11. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Supported

  12. 196 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    This should be posted as an Idea Exchange for Content. Then I would have votes left. :-) But yes, please.

  13. 198 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    With the advanced search option on users, it's so easy to create sets for monitoring or running jobs in Alma.
    But, sometimes it's useful to export the user set to work on in excel or in analytics. For that purpose, it's necessary to have a easy way of identifying the users.
    Could we please have the option to have the PID exported or any other unique identifier (barcode or University ID)? Then it's easy to create a set in analytics by filtering by the listed ID's.
    Thank you.

  14. 319 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    This would be very useful. Have no more votes left, but: Yes, please!

  15. 432 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  16. 251 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  17. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  18. 221 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  19. 225 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  20. 130 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base