Ann-Louise

My feedback

  1. 124 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone. This will be considered. First a comment and a question.
    Regarding “how about offering a drop-down list where users can choose a certain day of the month for report delivery”.
    This will not happen. Jobs of this nature need to be scheduled so that resources can be properly distributed.
    Regarding adding additional time, that may happen. Now a scheduled report has the following possible options. What would you like to see added and or changed?
    Every Monday at 03:00
    Every Monday at 07:00
    Every Monday at 09:00
    Every Day at 03:00
    Every Day at 07:00
    Every Day at 09:00
    On the 02 of every month at 03:00
    On the 02 of every month at 07:00
    On the 02 of every month at 09:00

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Hi. What's the status on this idea? Any progress?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Hi,
    I agree with everyone who says that different time-options for the morning is unnecessary, but still it seems that this is what you decide to keep, and add to one more day of the week.

    On our part what you add will not be an enhancement for our institution. Quaterly, half year and annual would be, but I notice that Ex Libris doesn't view this like the rest of the institutions that have been commenting on this case.

    Maybe I just don't understand the tecnical limitations behind not implementing these options.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Dear Yeol,
    then you leave me with the options of quarterly and half year. But, I still believe annual would be a good option. We do have several reports that are run on an annual basis. They are fixed and ready in Analytics, and adding them as a annually scheduled report in Alma, would benefit both the person needing to otherwise run and distribute the reports, and the receivers of the report, who then doesn't have to remind the said person to provide them with the reports.
    I believe we are not the only institution where the maker of the reports isn't the one actually taking interest in the report. In my case I do provide the institution with a lot of different reports, but not being the person interested in the report as such, I tend to forget when I'm expected to run them. I have to add reminders in the calendar. But that wouldn't be necessary if we had more scheduling options.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Hi, just to repeat myself: It would be nice to have the opportunity to schedule reports on a quarterly, half year and yearly basis.

    :-D

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    It would be nice to have the opportunity to schedule reports on a quarterly, half year and yearly basis. Daily, weekly and even monthly is too often for some analytics you like a scheduled report on.

  2. 104 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  5. 199 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Hi Moshe,
    Yes, it would make sense. For us, as already stated, especially the publication date is essential. I believe the user who created the res sha req then will be registered as interested user, and receives the interested in letter, if activated?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Hi, Moshe
    Sorry for the delayed answer. On our part the type of patron is irrelevant. We try to have the same level of service to all our patrons. Other institutions may prefer a more differentiated level of service here, I guess.

    Rules that would automatically transform a rs req into a purch req makes sense. The important thing is to keep track of history, so we know that this started as a rs req, in case we deny the purch req and prefer to make a ILL instead. Or we like to do both.

    Thanks,
    Ann-Louise

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    If the request is held back with status "ready to be sent", like it does with material self ownership=true, then we can approve sending manually.

    Ann-Louise shared this idea  · 
  6. 272 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise shared this idea  · 
  7. 604 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thank you for suggesting this idea, the direction is to enable customers to show more links and offer some configuration options to set preferences.

    Note that this is not something that we can do in the near future since it is a complex change.

    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  8. 54 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    Supported

  9. 207 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    This should be posted as an Idea Exchange for Content. Then I would have votes left. :-) But yes, please.

  10. 444 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  11. 266 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  12. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  13. 230 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  14. 237 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  15. 136 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  16. 554 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  17. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann-Louise commented  · 

    It would be interesting to be able to run a check on items you receive lending requests for, where you question whether the item should be available for RS or not.
    Interesting check-points: Is there a item policy, a location/FU/FUR/TOU that explaines it? A user group you have forgotten to restrict (maybe more for the borrowing requests)?

    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  18. 39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  19. 222 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise supported this idea  · 
  20. 136 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ann-Louise shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base