Laura Krier
My feedback
12 results found
-
52 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Laura Krier supported this idea · -
55 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·
-
126 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Laura Krier commentedI also support changing the functionality on the Return Items page so that multiple scans DO NOT record in-house. Staff regularly scan things in multiple times to make sure that items have been returned, so our in-house use counts are meaningless. It would be much better if in-house uses were ONLY counted on the Scan In Items page, when it is intentional.
-
25 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·
-
159 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Laura Krier commentedYes, this would be very, very helpful! One of the key uses for quick cataloging is adding personal copies for reserve, and a lot of the time this is media. Our reserves folks are not catalogers and asking them to edit MARC records is outside the scope of their work or comfort level.
-
157 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·
-
4 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·Laura Krier shared this idea ·
-
45 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Laura Krier commentedAnother area of functionality that would be very appreciated is how Alma deals with multi-year subscriptions. It should only encumber funds in the year the subscription needs to be renewed, not in every year that the subscription is open.
-
18 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·Laura Krier shared this idea ·
-
31 votesLaura Krier shared this idea ·
-
229 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·
-
57 votesLaura Krier supported this idea ·
Yes, it seems very weird to remove a block when a long overdue item is changed to lost. That's when we would want to create the block, so this seems counterintutive.