Skip to content

Katherine O'Brien

My feedback

32 results found

  1. 172 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  2. 233 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katherine O'Brien commented  · 

    Another +1 for selecting a CZ portfolio as part of the ebook purchase request workflow

    This would allow us to use purchase requests. We decided not to use purchase requests because it creates a local portfolio when the request is approved. We use the EBC integration profile, which only checks for existing CZ portfolios, not local ones, and so we end up with duplicate portfolios in our collection. The CZ portfolios are preferable but it is too much work to de-dupe and the integration profile is more valuable to us than the purchase request feature.

  3. 276 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katherine O'Brien commented  · 

    I think the fact that the Product team asked for clarification on this Idea shows that standard purchasing workflow needs of libraries really isn't understood by Ex Libris.

    We decided not to use purchase requests because it creates a local portfolio when the request is approved. We use the EBC integration profile, which only checks for existing CZ portfolios, not local ones, and so we end up with duplicate portfolios in our collection. The CZ portfolios are preferable but it is too much work to de-dupe and the integration profile is more valuable to us than the purchase request feature.

    The big appeal of e-titles in Alma is the CZ. It makes no sense to have a local portfolio created without the ability to link to a CZ portfolio with minimal hassle.

    Ex Libris also seems to struggle with the idea of libraries purchasing more user licenses for an existing electronic title, which fits with the confusion around this Idea also. If it's in the same collection, you don't want a new portfolio just because you purchased an extra user license.

    As Vanessa said - the desire is to link the request to a portfolio from the CZ. We want to minimise the number of local portfolios in our Alma, so that we have minimal management required for portfolios. Being able to link the request to CZ portfolios would in theory also address the local/CZ portfolio duplication issues.

    This would be really really useful for us.

  4. 241 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  5. 59 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  6. 105 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  7. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  8. 67 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    48 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  9. 27 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  10. 55 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katherine O'Brien commented  · 

    This is the only thing holding us back from implementing purchase requests (which would be very beneficial when we roll out Leganto across our institution). We are currently trying to work out a cumbersome workaround to fix the duplicate issue that occurs when our Proquest Ebook Central integration profile ignores local portfolios and brings in CZ portfolios of new ebook orders.

    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  11. 50 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  12. 156 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Under Review  ·  2 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  13. 224 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  14. 179 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katherine O'Brien commented  · 

    This should be a basic core function. Users expect it.

    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  15. 770 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  16. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  17. 36 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  18. 107 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  19. 65 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
  20. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Katherine O'Brien supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base