Jessica G
My feedback
16 results found
-
71 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
52 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
342 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that we plan to develop this option in the future. It is not in the current roadmap for this year, and we will update as soon as we have more details about the development planning.
Best regards,
Yael.
Jessica G
supported this idea
·
-
65 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jessica G
supported this idea
·
-
195 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
281 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
103 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
435 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
118 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
192 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
307 votesJessica G
supported this idea
·
-
260 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jessica G
commented
CARLI also supports a change to this behavior, and/or more flexibility to decide how it works. We would like physical inventory at other Institutions to appear in a Network search even when the institution has electronic inventory (without having to turn off Dedup), just as they do for any other physical titles the local institution does not own but that are owned by others in the Network. In our experience, just because an institution has electronic access does not mean that a user will not want a print version of that resource. By not displaying other consortial partners' physical inventory just because the local IZ has it electronically, the search results are providing an incomplete picture of all physical resources owned by the Network which may be requestable by users. Case #00880893.
Jessica G
supported this idea
·
-
165 votes
Yes, it will be possible to schedule the purge users job.
Jessica G
supported this idea
·
-
744 votes
Hi all,
We would like to update that this is planned to be developed in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface plans can be found here -
Therefore we are changing the status of this idea to "Planned".
Best regards,
Yael.
Jessica G
supported this idea
·
-
358 votes
We are looking into improvements that can be made to the Primo VE form, such as:
- Add a custom notice or message to the form
- Improve the form fields’ responsiveness to the requested format (book/article and physical/digital)
- Look into ways to enhance the configurability of the look and feel for the form
Jessica G
supported this idea
·
Many institutions in our consortium of 89 libraries have external users whose data are held in a campus system and loaded into Alma, and also have local community users whose data are managed internally in Alma. It would be helpful to have a way to allow the local users to edit their data in Primo VE's My Library Card themselves with the Edit button, but to prevent the students/staff/faculty from editing their data, so distinguishing whether or not the Edit button displays by the user group seems like a good suggestion. Our libraries need for the campus system to be the authoritative source of contact information for students/staff/faculty; if these users are allowed to Edit information in My Library Card, that change is only in Alma and has no way to get back to the campus system, so it is best if these users are prevented from editing and made to change such information in the campus system directly, which will then feed into Alma with the next load.