Jessica G

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

12 results found

  1. Add and improve audit logging and system event tracking for changes to Alma configuration

    135 votes
    6 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  2. User Purge should be made AFN aware and not allow the deletion of a user with active transactions or fines/fees at another AFN inst.

    71 votes
    3 comments  ·  Alma » User Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  3. Expose 'Export to Worldcat' management tag to Analytics

    73 votes
    11 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  4. Have the sort order for libraries affect the pickup location order in Primo

    14 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  5. Hide ‘edit’ option from My Library Card > Personal Details for specific user groups only

    65 votes
    5 comments  ·  Alma » User Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jessica G commented  · 

    Many institutions in our consortium of 89 libraries have external users whose data are held in a campus system and loaded into Alma, and also have local community users whose data are managed internally in Alma. It would be helpful to have a way to allow the local users to edit their data in Primo VE's My Library Card themselves with the Edit button, but to prevent the students/staff/faculty from editing their data, so distinguishing whether or not the Edit button displays by the user group seems like a good suggestion. Our libraries need for the campus system to be the authoritative source of contact information for students/staff/faculty; if these users are allowed to Edit information in My Library Card, that change is only in Alma and has no way to get back to the campus system, so it is best if these users are prevented from editing and made to change such information in the campus system directly, which will then feed into Alma with the next load.

    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  6. Allow libraries to configure the Brief Record Display with more flexibility

    284 votes
    5 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  7. Refreshing linked account expiration dates

    103 votes
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  8. Primo VE: Allow Exclusion of Institution Zone only records from Discovery Network/NZ Scope

    430 votes
    29 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  9. Please make the MARC bib. 245 subfield p from the bibliographic record available.

    115 votes
    6 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  10. text

    192 votes
    25 comments  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  11. course reserve

    305 votes
    9 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

  12. In Primo VE and in consortial Alma setup, display print and electronic inventory even if dedupe/frbr is enabled

    263 votes
    7 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jessica G commented  · 

    CARLI also supports a change to this behavior, and/or more flexibility to decide how it works. We would like physical inventory at other Institutions to appear in a Network search even when the institution has electronic inventory (without having to turn off Dedup), just as they do for any other physical titles the local institution does not own but that are owned by others in the Network. In our experience, just because an institution has electronic access does not mean that a user will not want a print version of that resource. By not displaying other consortial partners' physical inventory just because the local IZ has it electronically, the search results are providing an incomplete picture of all physical resources owned by the Network which may be requestable by users. Case #00880893.

    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)