Jessica G

My feedback

  1. 145 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  2. 164 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  3. 226 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  4. 89 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  5. 43 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  6. 108 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  7. 114 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  8. 174 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  9. 244 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  10. 756 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  11. 125 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jessica G commented  · 

    CARLI also supports a change to this behavior, and/or more flexibility to decide how it works. We would like physical inventory at other Institutions to appear in a Network search even when the institution has electronic inventory (without having to turn off Dedup), just as they do for any other physical titles the local institution does not own but that are owned by others in the Network. In our experience, just because an institution has electronic access does not mean that a user will not want a print version of that resource. By not displaying other consortial partners' physical inventory just because the local IZ has it electronically, the search results are providing an incomplete picture of all physical resources owned by the Network which may be requestable by users. Case #00880893.

    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  12. 113 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 
  13. 294 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jessica G supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base