Simon Read
My feedback
42 results found
-
43 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
86 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Simon Read
shared this idea
·
-
23 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
446 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
100 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Simon Read
commented
Hi Luigi, No, I haven't posted to CERV - you are welcome to do so. There was some discussion with the Esploro Product Managers last year about making improvements to the indexing of Esploro records in Primo that would, I think, solve the problem we have here. They were in discussions with the Primo Product managers about implementing some changes but there were no timeframes around it, so adding a CERV request would help indicate the continuing need for improvements in this area
Simon Read
shared this idea
·
-
68 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
112 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Simon Read
commented
I support the addition of view specific configuration. It is particularly important that titles that appear on the person entity card are actually accessible via that view. At the moment we can see electronic titles on the person entity card that users can't access because those titles aren't activated for that view (in our case we're using available for groups to control view level access). We can't realistically use the person entity functionality until this has been resolved
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Simon Read
shared this idea
·
-
96 votes
Simon Read
supported this idea
·
Totally agree. We have had to hide this field so as not to confuse patrons. At the very lest there should be a configuration option for sites to choose whether to present users with a pickup location or not