Corinna Baksik
My feedback
26 results found
-
234 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
231 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
To clarify, we're looking for the export to include the location and call number of the physical resource at the holdings level (e.g. we're not looking for a list of all item records and their "item call number" field). If an item is in a temp loc, that temp loc info would be what is exported.
Corinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
207 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
207 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
753 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Corinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
205 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
For example, when you search for Clemens, Samuel Langhorne, ǂd 1835-1910, you don’t get a reference generated from the NAR 500 fields in the browse index telling you to see also Twain, Mark, ǂd 1835-1910. And in the detailed view of this record, there’s no mention of Mark Twain’s “relationship” with Samuel Langhorne Clemens: http://id.lib.harvard.edu/alma/990099247200203941/catalog
In Serials Cataloging, we make a lot of 510s between earlier/later names of corp. bodies and 530s between earlier/later titles of series. These don’t get displayed. They did in the card catalog.Corinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
659 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
Corinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
267 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
311 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
303 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
178 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
221 votes
We have added it to our plan. We will share more details as part of the design phase
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
There is also a lack of stickiness. All dropdowns sticky (type, library, location) so that every time you go to the list your last selection is remembered.
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
I think the poster is confusing "Browse Bib Headings: Call Number" with the Browse Shelf List when they talk about 050 etc.
Browse Shelf List is and should remain based on the 852 of the call number.
-
57 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
61 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
249 votes
We will add this improvement to our roadmap
Corinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
20 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
284 votes
We are considering incorporating the idea and effect both templates and rules editing permission
Corinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
You can hide the month/date fields using the following CSS. You may have to make some additional adjustments for alignment.
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-tabs .advanced-drop-downs.marginless-inputs md-select[ng-model*="startDay"],
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-tabs .advanced-drop-downs.marginless-inputs md-select[ng-model*="startMonth"],
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-tabs .advanced-drop-downs.marginless-inputs md-select[ng-model*="endDay"],
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-tabs .advanced-drop-downs.marginless-inputs md-select[ng-model*="endMonth"] {
display:none;
}
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-wrapper .date-range-inputs md-input-container input[ng-model*="startYear"],
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-wrapper .date-range-inputs md-input-container input[ng-model*="endYear"] {
margin-left:-154px;
}