Corinna Baksik
My feedback
16 results found
-
100 votes
After reviewing this request, it seems that we already support this information in the new All Titles search sliding panel, where the record’s Names and Subjects are displayed. See the attachments.
Does this address the idea?
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
35 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
181 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
I think this would be very confusing. Who decides what "scholarly" is?
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
You can hide the month/date fields using the following CSS. You may have to make some additional adjustments for alignment.
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-tabs .advanced-drop-downs.marginless-inputs md-select[ng-model*="startDay"],
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-tabs .advanced-drop-downs.marginless-inputs md-select[ng-model*="startMonth"],
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-tabs .advanced-drop-downs.marginless-inputs md-select[ng-model*="endDay"],
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-tabs .advanced-drop-downs.marginless-inputs md-select[ng-model*="endMonth"] {
display:none;
}
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-wrapper .date-range-inputs md-input-container input[ng-model*="startYear"],
prm-search-bar .advanced-search-wrapper .date-range-inputs md-input-container input[ng-model*="endYear"] {
margin-left:-154px;
} -
276 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
To clarify, we're looking for the export to include the location and call number of the physical resource at the holdings level (e.g. we're not looking for a list of all item records and their "item call number" field). If an item is in a temp loc, that temp loc info would be what is exported.
Corinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
289 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
209 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
202 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
For example, when you search for Clemens, Samuel Langhorne, ǂd 1835-1910, you don’t get a reference generated from the NAR 500 fields in the browse index telling you to see also Twain, Mark, ǂd 1835-1910. And in the detailed view of this record, there’s no mention of Mark Twain’s “relationship” with Samuel Langhorne Clemens: http://id.lib.harvard.edu/alma/990099247200203941/catalog
In Serials Cataloging, we make a lot of 510s between earlier/later names of corp. bodies and 530s between earlier/later titles of series. These don’t get displayed. They did in the card catalog.Corinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
325 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
73 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
17 votesCorinna Baksik
shared this idea
·
-
204 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
77 votesCorinna Baksik
supported this idea
·
-
93 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Corinna Baksik
commented
I think this is the wrong approach. We do not want individual journal issues in the index at all - they flood the user with noise. For example, the HathiTrust issues are simply lists of issues with no added value to the user: http://screencast.com/t/TNMJqDSaH
That's a great question... Do you have a list of fields that get included in Names and Subjects? That will help us affirm that they include what we expect. Series statements are absent from the Linked Open Data but that might be acceptable