Naomi
My feedback
48 results found
-
46 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
128 votesNaomi
supported this idea
·
-
121 votesNaomi
supported this idea
·
-
56 votesNaomi
supported this idea
·
-
71 votesNaomi
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
Totally agree!
-
192 votesNaomi
supported this idea
·
-
226 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that we are planning to develop this option in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface planning can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
It would be very useful.!!
-
342 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that we plan to develop this option in the future. It is not in the current roadmap for this year, and we will update as soon as we have more details about the development planning.
Best regards,
Yael.
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
208 votes
Dear community,
Thank you for the idea. We suggest the following high level solution:
1. In Resources menu > Overlap and Collection Analysis > Compare collection analysis, it will be possible to select multiple match methods, from the existing list of match methods, and the order in which they will be used
2. The match will work as following: Try to match by method #1. If no match was found, try to match by method #2.
3. The report will include information on the matched identifier and its value
4. Similarly, in Resources menu > Overlap and Collection Analysis > Look Up Titles, it will be possible to upload an input file with multiple identifiers columns. The possible identifiers are the existing ones, and columns format will be the same as today. The difference is that it will be possible to place multiple identifier columns, in the order they should be used.
Thaks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma team
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
Great idea!
-
50 votes
Hello,
We are planning to add the collections by end of May 2024.
There were a few changes to the feed so it takes longer than expected.
Kind regards,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
They even have MARC file now, with all the full records.
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
I agree it's annoying.
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
We totally agree! Also the patron should see his/her digital loans / requests on his library card.
Naomi -
127 votes
Hello,
I am glad to inform that we are communicating with Kanopy to explore ways in obtaining metadata for their collection.
I will update this idea as we make progress.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesNaomi
shared this idea
·
-
19 votesNaomi
supported this idea
·
-
509 votes
We are investigating the options for enhancing the job reports as part of a general enhancement to the jobs UX, which will then allow gradually deploying report enhancements to the different jobs in Alma.
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
I support this idea. I noticed an error in the exceptions column: in the synchronize user reports, there are 0 exceptions even when there is a rejected user in the report, and this enforce me to open each report.
NaomiNaomi
supported this idea
·
-
91 votes
We are investigating how we can develop/support this functionality, thanks!
Naomi
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
I totally agree!
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
I agree. The Display logic rules - should have an option of "Show Service" and not only "Hide Service. The limit of "Hide" service force us to create complicated rules.
For example if we want to show the RS form only to 1 user group and only when the item is no owned by the library. We have to create 2 different rules, in one of them, we have to list all the other user groups from which we hide this service.
The functionality of the GES is much better.
NaomiNaomi
supported this idea
·
-
178 votesNaomi
supported this idea
·
-
197 votes
The solution approach will be to add a link from the user contact info pop up to the user record. This link will be available for users that have a role that allows viewing a full user record.
By having this link added to the user information pop up we will have added to the many places where user information is displayed.
An error occurred while saving the comment Naomi
commented
Any news regarding this enhancement?
Best regards
Naomi GalorNaomi
supported this idea
·
At present, an icon is displayed next to the electronic options to indicate whether an item is downloadable. However, it would be more beneficial to have a more nuanced indication regarding the download limitations. For instance: download the whole book or up to x pages, expiration limit, and so on.