Skip to content

Petra Gratzl

My feedback

19 results found

  1. 59 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  2. 79 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  3. 153 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    Dear Stacey, we also thought that this inconsistency is a defect and opened a case for that (07163092: 'All Titles/Electronic Portfolios: Different display of ISBN in results list depending on type of search [ubwpeg]' ). Unfortunately we were told to create an idea as it is an enhancement... Another idea on that (with only 3 votes) was closed by EL in April this year :-( https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma?query=request%20for%20uniform

    Petra Gratzl shared this idea  · 
  4. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    We support this idea but would like to have the possibility in Primo Classic!

    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  5. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl shared this idea  · 
  6. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl shared this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl shared this idea  · 
  8. 73 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  9. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    Hi Kirstie, I just played around in our Primo sandbox. We use formatting of PNX fields only in full display, but of course it is also possible for displaying fields in the results list. You can either add HTML tags (<b>) through normalization rules or use span tags and change display with the help of CSS. Of course you have to be careful and have to consider the consequences for export functions. So maybe you could use a local lds-field for the brief results and display it only there.

  10. 149 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello all,

    Alma currently support publishing of a set of records with the enriched related records information. For more information please refer to Related Records Enrichment section (MARC only) section in the online help page.

    Are you aware of this existing capability? Is this not sufficient for your needs?

    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  11. 81 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    We, too, think that the configuration options for the Excel export are far too limited. We would like to remove the EL Permalink as well and also the PNX field "Vernacular Title" as in our Primo the title in original alphabet is part of display/title. But the field cannot be removed in the View Wizard.
    Furthermore there are tags like <b> in CDI data. And also the tags of search words (<span class="searchword">) are exported to Excel...
    The implementation of this 2020 feature leaves room for improvements.

  12. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  13. 229 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    Also our users ask for more sorting options so that they can easily get a better overview of their active loans. Sorting options are indeed very limited and should be expanded.

  14. 61 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  15. 79 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    We'd also had feedback from users that exporting RIS format in the NUI takes many more clicks than before and should be UTF-8 encoding by default.

    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  16. 47 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    In general the restriction to BIB and HOL data in Alma publishing is very displeasing. At Vienna University Library we have troubles in several fields to reach the status of services and the range of functions from before going live with Alma (coming from an Aleph system). Especially regarding deep links we miss the opportunity to use fields of the item records in the course of normalization. Therefor e.g. we had to find a rather complex workaround to build the new acquisitions lists on sublibrary level by writing the inventory date of the item into the respective holdings record based on a daily Analytics report.
    Thus to only call for the content of the "public note" field of the items is by far not enough and is only part of the wishlist. We suggest to let Alma users decide which item fields (alternative call number, description, inventory date etc.) they need for Primo and to make it configurable which item fields to include into the Alma publishing process.
    There is already another idea which is due to be implemented:
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/17509633-publishing-of-alternative-call-number-from-alma-to
    There my colleague Christian already remarked in a comment that we also need fields like item description.

  17. 54 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello everyone,

    I’d like to share our plans to introduce support for XSL (Extensible Stylesheet Language) normalization rules. This new feature is designed for handling complex normalization tasks. It offers the flexibility of a full programming language, enabling advanced data manipulation. This will complement our existing normalization rules based on DROOLS, maintaining all of its current capabilities.

    Would the addition of this new type of normalization rule meet the requirements outlined in this idea?

    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  18. 134 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  19. 56 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base