Petra Gratzl

My feedback

  1. 71 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  2. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  3. 454 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    We fully support this idea as after the go-live with Alma we experienced severe misunderstandings due to the display of related records in Primo (Salesforce Case #00497487). But we would like to once again underline the importance of indicators, especially regarding MARC field 773. Thus we would prefer not only to have the oppurtunity to turn off linking of the field as a whole but more granular to turn off linking in connection with a specific combination of indicators.

  4. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  5. 113 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    Also our users ask for more sorting options so that they can easily get a better overview of their active loans. Sorting options are indeed very limited and should be expanded.

  6. 39 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    The possibility to filter for libraries would be very helpful as it is a search for *physical* titles (and not only on bibliographic level).

  7. 57 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  8. 51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    We'd also had feedback from users that exporting RIS format in the NUI takes many more clicks than before and should be UTF-8 encoding by default.

    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  9. 46 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
    Petra Gratzl commented  · 

    In general the restriction to BIB and HOL data in Alma publishing is very displeasing. At Vienna University Library we have troubles in several fields to reach the status of services and the range of functions from before going live with Alma (coming from an Aleph system). Especially regarding deep links we miss the opportunity to use fields of the item records in the course of normalization. Therefor e.g. we had to find a rather complex workaround to build the new acquisitions lists on sublibrary level by writing the inventory date of the item into the respective holdings record based on a daily Analytics report.
    Thus to only call for the content of the "public note" field of the items is by far not enough and is only part of the wishlist. We suggest to let Alma users decide which item fields (alternative call number, description, inventory date etc.) they need for Primo and to make it configurable which item fields to include into the Alma publishing process.
    There is already another idea which is due to be implemented:
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/17509633-publishing-of-alternative-call-number-from-alma-to
    There my colleague Christian already remarked in a comment that we also need fields like item description.

  10. 198 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  11. 51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  12. 90 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  13. 281 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 
  14. 58 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Petra Gratzl supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base