Clayton Crenshaw
My feedback
49 results found
-
34 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
121 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Changing the status back from Accepted. Please continue to vote on the idea as your votes will help us prioritize the development. Thank you.
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Clayton Crenshaw
shared this idea
·
-
4 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
59 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
shared this idea
·
-
95 votes
This is currently not planned to be developed. We might evaluate it again in the future.
Currently we are removing the "Under review" status.
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Clayton Crenshaw
commented
In addition, I would like to be able to suppress/hide selected types that are not "Most Common." Many of those would rarely, if ever, be added to a list, so reducing the cognitive load on instructors would improve the user experience.
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
Clayton Crenshaw
supported this idea
·
Agreed. In our use case, we would like to separate location and loan period for physical items into two successive questions rather than one long list that combines them.