Anna P
My feedback
14 results found
-
114 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
155 votes
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
148 votes
I wonder if this request takes into account that certain fields in the 1XX/6XX/7XX have different first indicator definitions in the MARC21 standard for Bibliographic fields compared to their corresponding Authority fields. In such cases, copying the first indicator from the Authority to the Bibliographic heading would result in incorrect data. Is the reqeust is about Names only? Hans, I would recommend consulting with AAFG group for a details spec where this requested behavior is valid to which fields.
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
51 votes
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
86 votes
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
110 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anna P
commented
Having the option to check multiple invoice lines at once would be really helpful.
But as a general information: if you check the pro rata checkbox, without entering anything into the fields, the four correspondig invoice lines don't get created. Additionally, it is also possible to have the checkbox selected by default. -
157 votes
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
203 votes
AdminAdina Marciano
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Thank you for the suggested idea. We see its value and will consider it in the future. This development requires integration with third-party providers, and we will need to investigate the possibility of this development.
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
267 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The difference from option 1 is that when an item…
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Anna P
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Anna P
shared this idea
·
-
12 votes
Anna P
supported this idea
·
Additionally it would be great, if the recently used Unicode-Sets could be sticky, instead of being reset when starting a new session.