Christian

My feedback

47 results found

  1. 139 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Christian supported this idea  · 
  2. 61 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    Just to be reminded:
    The NERS voting winner from 2021: ID #7177 ... Add option to configure Process Types for Unavailable Physical Items, without creation of requests

    However, the implementation did not meet the specifications. That's why there are always new attempts to get a usable solution ...

  3. 61 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello,

    This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.

    It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.

    My sincere apologies.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

    Christian supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello,

    This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.

    It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.

    My sincere apologies.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

    Christian supported this idea  · 
  5. 51 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello,

    This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.

    It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.

    My sincere apologies.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

    Christian supported this idea  · 
  6. 16 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello,

    This request has been selected as part of the 2025 CERV votes.

    We will reach out to the content provider, and ask for the metadata for his collection.

    If you can share a designated contact person with this provider, that would be much appreciated.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

    Christian supported this idea  · 
  7. 9 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello,

    This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.

    It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.

    My sincere apologies.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

    Christian supported this idea  · 
  8. 75 votes
    How important is this to you?
  9. 117 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    The notes-tab also stores other "notes" that do not belong here, e.g. "Line was removed from Order PO-123456"

  10. 6 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    Hi Kylie,
    see also: Add a link from the PO line to the "Receive" workbench (https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/47291660-add-a-link-from-the-po-line-to-the-receive-workb) and the comment - in the new layout of the PO Line Task List receiving is possible directly within the PO Line.
    Best regards,
    Christian.

  11. 2 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    Hi,
    you can set parameters like "User group" for "Booking" fulfillment unit rules or have i misunderstood this idea?
    Christian.

  12. 20 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    In the new layout of the PO Line Task List receiving is possible directly within the PO Line.

    1. Open the PO Line in "Edit" mode
    2. Go to "Ordered items" section
    3. Click the ellipsis menu ("...") and choose "Receive"

  13. 34 votes
    5 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Christian supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    A note about the CSS work-a-round:

    When you open the "full view" of a record the HTML code for this pages looks like:
    <body class="md-dialog-is-showing" ...>
    <primo-explore>
    <prm-report-problem>
    Due to a CSS directive the "Feedback" dialog is displayes.

    However, when you reload such a "full view" page, the HMTL codes changes to:
    <body>
    <primo-explore>
    <prm-report-problem>
    Now the class "md-dialog-is-showing" and the CSS directive does not work anymore and the "Give us Feedback" section is not displayed.
    The work-a-round does not work in this case.

    Please provide us a solution via the Primo backend (Primo BO) where we can define on which pages in Primo the "Feedback" dialog should be displayed.
    Thank you in advance!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    It is the same with us, also we have only one option active ('Report a broken link'), because we currently use another tool for general user requests. So the feedback option only makes sense in the full display, but Ex Libris support told us that this configuration possibility is not planned for the near future.
    Therefore, currently we control the display resp. non-display via CSS:

    /* Generally do not show the 'Feedback tool' ... */
    prm-report-problem {
    visibility: hidden;
    }
    /* ... but show it only on the Full Display screen (desktop view) ... */
    body.md-dialog-is-showing prm-report-problem,
    prm-full-view-page prm-report-problem {
    visibility: visible;
    }
    /* ... and also on mobile devices (not only in 'landscape mode') ... */
    body.md-dialog-is-showing prm-report-problem div.report-container button#reportProblem,
    prm-full-view-page prm-full-view-page prm-report-problem {
    display: block;
    }
    /* ... but do not show it in top menu ('...' menu) */
    body.md-dialog-is-showing primo-explore.background-dark prm-report-problem {
    visibility: hidden;
    }
    div button.report-problem-menu-mobile {
    display: none;
    }

  14. 71 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    Addendum:
    The idea made it to the 2nd round of NERS 2023 voting, but then did not receive enough votes to be implemented.

    Attached the implementation plans discussed with Ex Libris (8212-solution with images.docx) and two notes:

    (1) Side effect: Have all identifiers on the PO line ("Preferred" and "Proposed Identifiers") be searchable in the Receiving workbench.

    (2) Additional information for an identifier like (hardcover : alk. paper):
    Our colleagues would be pleased if this information could be printed on the order letters. Correctly this information is stored in subfield $c. Sometimes it is stored in subfield $a but this is not common practice.

    https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd020.html
    020 - International Standard Book Number (R)
    $a - International Standard Book Number (NR)
    $c - Terms of availability (NR)
    $q - Qualifying information (R)

    https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd024.html
    024 - Other Standard Identifier (R)
    $a - Standard number or code (NR)
    $c - Terms of availability (NR)
    $q - Qualifying information (R)

    https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd028.html
    028 - Publisher or Distributor Number (R)
    $a - Publisher or distributor number (NR)
    $b - Source (NR)
    $q - Qualifying information (R)

    Ideally the content of subfield $c and $q will be stored in the XML field <type> under the node <meta_data_values>.
    And if subfield $a contains not only the identifier, Ex Libris "splits" the content:
    - identifier ... goes to <identifier>
    - and the rest ... goes to <type>

    Christian shared this idea  · 
  15. 59 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Christian shared this idea  · 
  16. 24 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian commented  · 

    Note: this is not only a Primo VE issue. It is also relevant for the 'classic' Primo UI.

    Christian supported this idea  · 
  17. 37 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Christian shared this idea  · 
  18. 24 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Christian shared this idea  · 
  19. 48 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Christian supported this idea  · 
  20. 33 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Christian shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base