Mally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
My feedback
20 results found
-
96 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
167 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment it is very important
Mally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
33 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Hi. 1. Are you stating that you want a new “Resource Type”?
2. The definitions of the resource types are explained in the table titled “Rules Used to Create the Resource Type Field – MARC 21/KORMARC and UNIMARC” at https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/010Getting_Started/050Alma_User_Interface_%E2%80%93_General_Information/Searching_in_Alma#The_Resource_Type_Field
3. Do you want a new row in this table which would be as follows?
Archival materials. LDR pos. 8 = a
4. The table is read top to bottom and as soon as match is found it stops. Where in the table would you like this new row to appear?
5. How come the title of this suggestion states “LDR pos. 8 = a” but the comment from Feb. 2 also has “LDR pos. 6 = p”? We do not think “LDR pos. 6 = p” is a good idea. That is used for “mixed materials”. On the other hand “LDR pos. 8…Mally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
295 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi Chainy
thank you for your comment.
we know that we can use the local field and use normalization rules for search and facet. but we have only 10 NR and we have finished all.
This is so basic - (publisher, series and edition), thus we don't think it should be part of the 10 local fields with NR for search. It is either we will have more than 10 (at least 15) or (publisher, series and edition) should be OTB.
I believe this is very important not only for my institute but also for others
thank you very much.
MallyMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
shared this idea
·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment You are absolutely right. There should be differentiation between the official names in the letters from Alma to catchy names for the readers
Mally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
63 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
299 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Agree - it is just visual disturbance
-
221 votes
Dear all, since this idea combines various very different enhancement requests for Alma's normalization rules infrastructure, we are unable to add these to our roadmap at this time. This may change as we get more information on prioritization and needs. In the meantime, we suggest opening dedicated ideas for specific enhancements you would like to promote.
An error occurred while saving the comment very important
-
13 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
58 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
428 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
Mally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
shared this idea
·
-
83 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
56 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
Show the terms added to the patron's query by the linguistic features (i.e. stemming, synonyms etc.)
57 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
93 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
47 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
-
103 votesMally Cohen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
supported this idea
·
it is a very basic and most important feature