Betsy R.

My feedback

  1. 201 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  2. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
    Betsy R. commented  · 

    Yes!!!! My computer programming instructor would have failed me if I had written code that allowed the deletion of data that was still in use by another process without so much as an error message or request for confirmation. And that request needs to be specific, i.e. "This set is referenced xyz job [or even "a job"]. Are you sure you want to delete?" Generic "Are you sure you want to delete this set" messages that appear for all deletion requests are completely useless. Generic "are you sure you want to delete this set" messages that only come up when there is a conflict, but don't tell you what the conflict is are only slightly better than useless.

  3. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. commented  · 

    See "New Analytics field for OCLC number in Bibliographic Details" for a suggestion of how to fix this.

    Thanks for the warning re: the order in which the numbers appear. So far as I could tell, there WAS no order. :-(

  4. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
    Betsy R. commented  · 

    Us too!

  5. 90 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  6. 307 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  7. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. commented  · 

    **Note, this is the same as the suggestion titled "Add Holdings Record note elements to Alma Analyics"

  8. 69 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  9. 127 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Due to limitations in the metadata associated with some content sources, there are cases where content that is full text is marked as being only an abstract, or where an abstract is marked as full text. Currently the system errs on marking it as full text, which provides some false positives. We could flip the priority which would reduce if not eliminate full-text icons appearing for abstracts, however, this would result in some full text being erroneously marked as abstract only.

    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  10. 124 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  11. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  12. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  13. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  14. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Rosetta » Ingest  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  15. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  16. 30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  17. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  18. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions  ·  Admin →
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
    Betsy R. commented  · 

    Please make ALL Enum Chron fields available on the first screen. Toggling back and forth is a pain and just begs for errors. Worse, when receiving a new issue, you have to actually save and leave the item record, then relaunch the item editor in order to finish entering the complete data. Very time inefficient!

  19. 103 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
  20. 70 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Betsy R. supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base