Betsy R.
My feedback
16 results found
-
495 votes
When creating a a POL, it will be possible to also define a default item policy and temporary location. This will be used when items are created (by a prediction pattern or manually) on POL or at receive time
Betsy R. supported this idea · -
30 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
39 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Betsy R. commentedUs too!
-
52 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Betsy R. commented**Note, this is the same as the suggestion titled "Add Holdings Record note elements to Alma Analyics"
-
222 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
-
24 votesAdi Alter responded
Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers
Betsy R. supported this idea · -
35 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
-
10 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
-
58 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Betsy R. commentedPlease make ALL Enum Chron fields available on the first screen. Toggling back and forth is a pain and just begs for errors. Worse, when receiving a new issue, you have to actually save and leave the item record, then relaunch the item editor in order to finish entering the complete data. Very time inefficient!
-
118 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
-
91 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
-
199 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Betsy R. commentedWhat about "Add above" and "Add below" options on the Action drop down menu, enabling creation of a new rule in the proper place in the list? Then there would be less sorting of the list needed.
-
78 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
-
197 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
-
96 votesBetsy R. supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Betsy R. commentedYes!! This would be very good for running lists for weeding, etc., where I want to pull a series of reports limited by location or call number range. Please add this!
Yes!!!! My computer programming instructor would have failed me if I had written code that allowed the deletion of data that was still in use by another process without so much as an error message or request for confirmation. And that request needs to be specific, i.e. "This set is referenced xyz job [or even "a job"]. Are you sure you want to delete?" Generic "Are you sure you want to delete this set" messages that appear for all deletion requests are completely useless. Generic "are you sure you want to delete this set" messages that only come up when there is a conflict, but don't tell you what the conflict is are only slightly better than useless.