Galen Jones
My feedback
45 results found
-
781 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
331 votes
Thank you posting this idea. Moving it to under review for further analysis.
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
201 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
211 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
636 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Galen Jones commented
This would need to be opt in / opt out e.g. for institutions with overseas campuses, or large no.s of distance learners where provision of print journal articles isn't the appropriate solution.
-
72 votes
-
60 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
268 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
97 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
65 votes
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
-
223 votes
Dear all,
We are looking into this idea, and it includes several enhancement requests with varying complexity. Could you please provide a prioritized list, so we can better asses these requests according to complexity and priority (alternatively, you might consider opening dedicated ideas - like in Hanoch Roniger's comment below - to gauge the need in the community for each feature)?
Thanks!
Lili
Galen Jones supported this idea ·
Hi Tamar,
One particularly noteworthy example of PR misrepresentation relating to AIDS denialism is:
Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E. (1988) ‘Reappraisal of AIDS--is the oxidation induced by the risk factors the primary cause?’, Medical hypotheses, 25(3), pp. 151–162.
DOI: 10.1016/0306-9877(88)90053-9
CDI ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78219233
All of the articles in this journal pre 2010 are not peer reviewed according to:
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/5217839
It appears that there are over 9k inaccurate CDI example records for this single title:
https://librarysearch.cardiff.ac.uk/discovery/search?query=any,contains,1532-2777&tab=CSCOP_EVERYTHING&search_scope=CU_Search_ALL&vid=44WHELF_CAR:44WHELF_CAR_VU1&facet=searchcreationdate,include,1975%7C,%7C2009&facet=tlevel,include,peer_reviewed&offset=0
By marking non-peer reviewed, and in this case pseudoscientific content, as being peer reviewed, the content is being given undue validity by Ex Libris which could have implications on current research and scholarship.