Galen Jones
My feedback
27 results found
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Galen Jones supported this idea · -
11 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
40 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
59 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
3 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
797 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Galen Jones commentedHi Tamar,
One particularly noteworthy example of PR misrepresentation relating to AIDS denialism is:
Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E. (1988) ‘Reappraisal of AIDS--is the oxidation induced by the risk factors the primary cause?’, Medical hypotheses, 25(3), pp. 151–162.
DOI: 10.1016/0306-9877(88)90053-9
CDI ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78219233All of the articles in this journal pre 2010 are not peer reviewed according to:
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/5217839It appears that there are over 9k inaccurate CDI example records for this single title:
https://librarysearch.cardiff.ac.uk/discovery/search?query=any,contains,1532-2777&tab=CSCOP_EVERYTHING&search_scope=CU_Search_ALL&vid=44WHELF_CAR:44WHELF_CAR_VU1&facet=searchcreationdate,include,1975%7C,%7C2009&facet=tlevel,include,peer_reviewed&offset=0By marking non-peer reviewed, and in this case pseudoscientific content, as being peer reviewed, the content is being given undue validity by Ex Libris which could have implications on current research and scholarship.
Galen Jones supported this idea · -
5 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
18 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
4 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
6 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
208 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
60 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
282 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
95 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
24 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
46 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
67 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
218 votes
Dear all, since this idea combines various very different enhancement requests for Alma's normalization rules infrastructure, we are unable to add these to our roadmap at this time. This may change as we get more information on prioritization and needs. In the meantime, we suggest opening dedicated ideas for specific enhancements you would like to promote.
Galen Jones supported this idea · -
54 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
222 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
Voted! - this would be an extremely valuable enhancement