Galen Jones
My feedback
26 results found
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Galen Jones supported this idea · -
11 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
40 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
59 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
3 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
797 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Galen Jones commentedHi Tamar,
One particularly noteworthy example of PR misrepresentation relating to AIDS denialism is:
Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E. (1988) ‘Reappraisal of AIDS--is the oxidation induced by the risk factors the primary cause?’, Medical hypotheses, 25(3), pp. 151–162.
DOI: 10.1016/0306-9877(88)90053-9
CDI ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78219233All of the articles in this journal pre 2010 are not peer reviewed according to:
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/5217839It appears that there are over 9k inaccurate CDI example records for this single title:
https://librarysearch.cardiff.ac.uk/discovery/search?query=any,contains,1532-2777&tab=CSCOP_EVERYTHING&search_scope=CU_Search_ALL&vid=44WHELF_CAR:44WHELF_CAR_VU1&facet=searchcreationdate,include,1975%7C,%7C2009&facet=tlevel,include,peer_reviewed&offset=0By marking non-peer reviewed, and in this case pseudoscientific content, as being peer reviewed, the content is being given undue validity by Ex Libris which could have implications on current research and scholarship.
Galen Jones supported this idea · -
5 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
18 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
4 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
6 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
208 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
66 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
284 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
95 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
24 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
46 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
67 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
218 votes
Hello everyone,
I’d like to share our plans to introduce support for XSL (Extensible Stylesheet Language) normalization rules. This new feature is designed for handling complex normalization tasks. It offers the flexibility of a full programming language, enabling advanced data manipulation. This will complement our existing normalization rules based on DROOLS, maintaining all of its current capabilities.
Would the addition of this new type of normalization rule meet the requirements outlined in this idea?
Galen Jones supported this idea · -
54 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
-
222 votesGalen Jones supported this idea ·
Voted! - this would be an extremely valuable enhancement