Skip to content

Luigi Siciliano

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

36 results found

  1. Remove Oclc only limitation in 035 indexing in Primo VE - i.e. index all 035 values

    11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  2. Add moore options to local portoflio

    15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 

  3. Enable Public Notes display for content within Database-type collections

    208 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    We strongly support implementation of this idea and we rely on Alma + Primo classic.
    Actually, rather than an enhancement request, it looks to me that the current behaviour of Database type collections is inconsistent with the general behavior of collections in the system, and should be fixed without the need of an enhancement request.

  4. user - add option for dynamic purge date - e.g. 12 months after expiration date

    107 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Alma » User Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    I mean of course update the value in purge date when saving *the user*.

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  5. Esploro - Add action for assigning a name variant to job Update Set of Research Assets

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Esploro » Research Portal and Publishing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 

  6. Add link to Leganto and other resources on Esploro Researcher Profile

    34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Esploro » Researcher Profiles  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Na'ama Shamir Kenan responded

    Dear Colleagues, 

    This item is not planned for 2023 but I am keeping it open here for more votes and future reference. 

    We will let you know if there will be any updates. 

    BR

    Na'ama

    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 

  7. Make Public Note of a Representation Translatable

    30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Alma Digital » Discovery  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Actually it would be great if all Public Notes, also those of electronic collection and electronic services and portfolios, could be translatable.

    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 

  8. Mechanism to validate binary MARC record structure

    64 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Metadata Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Exporting structurally invalid binary MARC records sounds like more like an error that should be pointed out and fixed. Did anyone open a case about it?

  9. Add " Additional e-mails " fields to " Report to ex libris " form in Alma

    17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  10. Purge User Records - allow to keep users with Blocks

    85 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » User Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  11. R&W-online (http://online.ruw.de)

    30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Content » New provider  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 

  12. Primo Central Index ( PCI ) - more granularity in excluding content from activated resources - e.g. exclude from index by resource type

    100 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    @François,
    the solution you propose is quite powerful. Perhaps a bit complex to implement and manage, but of course powerful.
    Simply allowing to include/exclude in the index by resource type (e.g. exclude Book reviews and Reference and include articles) would be an important step ahead that perhaps is more doable in the short term.
    However the two ideas go in the same direction and make clear to ExL how some sort of improvement must be figured out.

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  13. Allow to delete records in Primo BE ( included dedup records )

    44 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  14. [Primo] - frbr - improve algorythm - consider all keys and not only the first matching key

    117 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Let me add that the documentation section I quoted in this idea, explaining the current behavior, is the chapter "The FRBR Vector" in the Technical Guide.

    Can be found here:
    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/Technical_Guide/040FRBRization/010The_FRBR_Vector

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  15. Show the terms added to the patron's query by the linguistic features (i.e. stemming, synonyms etc.)

    57 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Two closely related ideas are:

    new option/checkbox: "expand my results with synonyms"
    http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/18441406-new-option-checkbox-expand-my-results-with-synon

    Send the same enriched query (stemming, synonyms, etc) to both local index and Primo Central PC index ( important for blended search ) http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/18551905-send-the-same-enriched-query-stemming-synonyms

    There is also a thread in the Primo ML having as subject:
    [Primo] query enrichment is applied by default and is a bit a black box - need for improvements to linguistic features

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  16. Copy parts of Normalization Rules Sets to other fields in the same set

    35 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Dear Lukas thank you for proposing this old NERS request as idea. Both approaches, copy NR subset (statically) or include NR subset (dynamically) are useful. We preferred in our original NERS proposal the latter approach because it allows to use subset of NR as routines in a procedural language, and in case of update of the NR subset, any change would have been applied automatically to/inherited by all NR using that included subset.
    On the other hand statically copying pieces of rules - as you propose in this idea - allows to use them as templates and it's perhaps easier to implement. Which might also be a factor.
    Under the circumstances, any of the two solutions would be welcomed.

2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)