Deborah Fitchett

My feedback

  1. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback.
    Today Primo does present viewit services for resources that do not have full text indications.
    We will check with Primo if this can be changed as the Unpaywall service can appear also when there is no full text service.

    Note that this issue is not relevant to PrimoVE

    Deborah Fitchett commented  · 

    (Just because subscriptions/OA status is volatile, noting another example, this one in production, where oadoi.org gives a result but the Unpaywall link doesn't appear: https://primo-direct-apac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_ovid00006114-201303190-00024&context=PC&vid=LU&lang=en_US&search_scope=All_resources&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,chocolate&facet=searchcreationdate,include,2000%7C,%7C2020&offset=0&pcAvailability=true)

    (Also noting that on an Alma-L email on 10th Nov 2019 Dana noted that they had identified an issue that "Unpaywall service does not appear when it is the only service available" which might be construed as describing this issue? She said it would be resolved as part of the December release but this issue still exists.)

    Deborah Fitchett shared this idea  · 
  2. 59 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  3. 246 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  4. 30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Deborah Fitchett commented  · 

    Ease of setting up/maintaining normalisation rules is one of our key requirements for moving to Primo VE so this is very important to us.

    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    Deborah Fitchett shared this idea  · 
  6. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Deborah Fitchett shared this idea  · 
  7. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  8. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  9. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett shared this idea  · 
  10. 136 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett commented  · 

    Further feedback on this: because the review type currently contains 2 things we're really concerned about the August release lowering the ranking of reviews. Book reviews should be ranked lower than the books they review - but systematic reviews are exceptionally valuable (we've seen lecturers enthusiastically praising the "Review" facet to their students because they're assuming it's only literature reviews) and shouldn't be ranked lower.

    Deborah Fitchett commented  · 

    I think it would be useful for Ex Libris to confirm what their intentions are! I'd expect systematic reviews to come under "article", yes, but also see the value of it appearing under an additional "review article" or "systematic review" facet - just not under the facet that covers book reviews, computer reviews, car reviews, etc, which are entirely different.

    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  11. 50 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  12. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
    Deborah Fitchett commented  · 

    Speaking for my library, we want to be able to move the "Send-to" section below the "Get it" section.

    I've got some neat Angular from another library that lets me switch pretty much any other section. But when I try to switch Get It and Send To, it gets very confused about where to put the 'sign in' message (this appears to be calculated by assuming Get It will always be second in order....)

  13. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett commented  · 

    We have a lot of users who think they have to use the arrows to change the year by 1 at a time and don't realise they can retype it at all. :-o

    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  14. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
    Deborah Fitchett shared this idea  · 
  15. 99 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  16. 236 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  17. 164 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  18. 116 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
  19. 109 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hello all,

    As you are aware, we have made many attempts to establish contact with Lynda.com, and now LinkedIn, for the purpose of ingesting this content in our Index.

    We are reaching out to our community with the hopes that you can assist us in creating the necessary momentum to reach an agreement with LinkedIn.

    Until that time, this Idea will be on hold.

    Best,
    Rael

    Deborah Fitchett commented  · 

    Just to suggest anyone who wants this contact Lynda.com (if you haven't already) to add pressure to them to collaborate on this. It took me a while to get them to understand the huge value it would provide us, and some more time to explain that the fact that we've all got different urls is not a blocker; even then I couldn't tell how high they're prioritising it.

    If you need to go through your IT / other department, explaining that doing this would increase visability and therefore usage of Lynda videos will probably help.

  20. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Deborah Fitchett supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base