Many times when we found wrong metadata in PCI and reported to Ex Libris for correction, it took them a long time to contact the data vendors to make the corrections. Sometimes they never can get response or correction from the vendors, and the wrong metadata stayed in PCI without any changes. The wrong metadata is really misleading and cannot generate the correct OpenURLs for users to reach the full text articles. I would suggest Ex Libris to build an internal metadata correction layer for the PCI data to improve its quality. With this layer, even the vendors don't correct the wrong metadata, Primo and Primo VE still can display the correct metadata and generate the correct OpenURLs.

HathiTrust collections are defined by access rights; materials that are fully accessible to users are within their Full View collection, which includes Public Domain, Open Access, Creative Commons, and other materials to which owners have given permissions for access. Materials restricted in access are defined as Limited - Search Only; these materials include those with copyright restrictions. These two categories, Full View and Limited - Search Only can be further refined by geographical region, for US or non-US. Info about access rights is at https://www.hathitrust.org/access_use and info about data files is at https://www.hathitrust.org/data.

The ExLibris CZ (and PCI) collections for HathiTrust do not align with the HathiTrust files available. Instead, the ExLibris collections are limited to Public Domain (only) Collections, which includes no Open Access/Creative Commons/Other Licensed content beyond the Public Domain; and Copyright restricted collections. These two categories are then further refined by US and non-US.

It would be much better to have access to the entire Full View HathiTrust collections; the restriction to Public Domain seems arbitrary and unhelpful, and it is not a restriction that HathiTrust makes itself. Since the data files are out there and made fully accessible for use, I sincerely implore ExLibris to use the data files or OAI harvest from HathiTrust to provide full and accurate access to the collections. The existing ExLibris CZ (and PCI) collections are extremely inadequate.

Our goal is to include records for all those materials to which users have full access but exclude records for copyright-restricted materials, which is not currently possible with the existing ExLibris collections, which either leave out accessible materials or include copyright-restricted.

I would like separate electronic collections in the Community Zone for Factiva, specific to the academic subscription product and non-academic subscription products.

We have an academic subscription to Factiva and have activated the Electronic Collection 'Factiva' in the Community Zone. When you follow the links to full text in many of the portfolio records, you get a message saying 'No search results. This may be due to content restrictions on your academic account'. I believe this is because this single electronic collection contains records relating to content that is available to subscribers of the academic product, but also records relating to content that is not available via the academic subscription. I would like separate Electronic Collections containing only records for the content that is available via the relevant product.

In 360 KB and SFX (maybe in Alma as well) there exist several databases for Portico - triggered Content.

But Portico has a supplementary offer that is called "Portico - Post-cancellation/perpetual access". This offer contains journals from various publishers where the post-cancellation access is partly not through the platform of the publisher but through Portico.

You find some information about this offer here: https://www.portico.org/for-participants/#pca

The title lists for this database can be found here: https://www.portico.org/coverage/titles/ - it includes e-journals and e-books.

I ask you to add this database to SFX and 360 KB (and Alma if it doesn't exist there as well).

This is a request to add a single free/open access collection for all Springer Nature free/open access journals. Currently there are 4 community zone collections in Alma with many overlaps:

SpringerOpen Free - (CKB)613170000000000044

BioMed Central open Access - (CKB)611000000000000500

Bacon Springer Nature Global Open Access - (CKB)613780000000000900
Springer Nature Oa Journals - (CKB)614910000000000075

We’d like the addition of one single consolidated collection because having the above 4 collections is unnecessarily confusing for students and staff as they currently encounter so many electronic collections for the same journal/article even when different community zone electronic collection links in Primo end up on the same platform page.
A single collection would be much simpler, and we could then deactivate the 4 collections cited here – would be great if they were removed completely from the community zone. This is also more in-line with other publishers such as the singular ‘Wiley Online Library Open Access’ and ‘Taylor & Francis Open Access’ community zone electronic collections.