Karen Spence
My feedback
29 results found
-
64 votes
-
72 votes
-
53 votes
-
128 votes
-
204 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
-
32 votes
Hello,
We are working with the provider to obtain MARC records to enrich JoVE collections.
Kind regards,
Tamar
-
199 votes
-
181 votes
-
139 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alma has unfortunately always done a poor job of tracking anything accurately or logically in the History tab of all records. Improvements in tracking changes are sorely needed.
-
122 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment A related idea that was closed: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/43767285-custom-reordering-of-pol-notes
-
165 votes
Dear all,
Thank you for sharing this idea.
I have read it carefully, and would like to make sure that I understand it:
Current situation:
There are several processes in PO line workflow which add automatic internal notes, for example:
- Renewal ("PO Line has been renewed automatically on…")
- Moving PO line out of PO (""Line was removed from Order ...")
- other.
Desired outcome:
Have a configurable option to disable these notes from being created. Each of these processes is/will be saved in the PO line history.
Please let me know if this understanding is correct.
Thanks,
Zohar Shemesh
Alma product team
An error occurred while saving the comment At the very least we should have the option to configure whether these automatically generated notes are added or not.
-
86 votes
-
46 votes
-
97 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Can the Show CDI records be more granular? We want to show local IZ records, and show CDI chapter/article records, and hide CDI title records.
-
45 votes
-
51 votes
-
30 votes
-
84 votes
-
802 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
Making the fields reportable in Analytics would be a great help and my first priority. Making the list of values editable, such as for authorization method, would be my next priority. Regardless of what three fields may be added, if the information in the interface record isn't reportable, it is much less useful. Other information that we record in the interface record (in a free-text field) is whether the IP addresses can be updated ourselves via the admin account or whether we need to contact the vendor directly. Also we are starting to track which vendors use IP Registry. Adding accessibility information is an interesting idea, although I suspect it would be more useful to add that information in a record that could be made visible to our users in the catalog.