Manu Schwendener
My feedback
512 results found
-
35 votes
-
67 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment 60 and and 136 votes in the two ideas Floriane links to.
-
67 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
99 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I do not understand why all other elements can be moved, but not this one.
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/020Primo_VE/Primo_VE_(English)/050Display_Configuration/010Configuring_Discovery_Views_for_Primo_VE#Ordering_the_ServicesAn error occurred while saving the comment NERS 7458, open for voting now.
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi Christian
> define the e-mail field as a mandatory
As far as I know this shold come with the March 2023 release.
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment In the meantime you could use https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/blog/report-a-broken-link-in-primove
-
794 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Related: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/45614302-fill-the-gap-of-open-access-cdi-records-not-marked: Make the open access icon more accurate
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment To prevent confusion:
> As well as with the current e-mail functionality of bibliographic citations, we
> would expect the e-mail to be automatically pre-filled when a user is logged
> inIn Primo BO, the email address of the logged in user is filled in as _receiver_ email address, not the _sender_.
---
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Thank you for clarifying, Timothee
I agree that this behaviour is counter-intuitive.
---
Example:
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/collectionDiscovery?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live
The structure is
Recommendations – Empfehlungen nach Fachgebiet – Geschichte – Fachbibliothek digitale GeschichtswissenschaftSearch for 'Metamorphosen'
1 hit
– if you search in all collections / Recommendations
– if you search in Fachbibliothek digitale Geschichtswissenschaft https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/collectionDiscovery?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&collectionId=814023397700055040 hits if you search in
– Empfehlungen nach Fachgebiet https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/collectionDiscovery?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&collectionId=81362795860005504
or
– Geschichte https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/collectionDiscovery?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&collectionId=81371321710005504An error occurred while saving the comment [...]
Do you have an example where it doesn't work?
-
55 votes
-
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Filtering for year is not precise, either:
If I search for corona OR covid published in 2023, I get 28 titles.
Most of them have 2023 as the date, but not all of them
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/search?query=any,contains,corona%20OR%20covid,AND&pfilter=dr_s,exact,20230101,AND&pfilter=dr_e,exact,20231231,AND&tab=41SLSP_CDI&search_scope=CentralIndex&vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&mode=advanced&offset=0An error occurred while saving the comment > still broken in CDI
If it can't be fixed, remove the fields for month and day in advanced search.
(If it can be fixed, but only applies to CDI, it should only be visible for search profiles that include CDI)
---
Example: unlikely that there have been 113'450 CDI titles published about Covid or Corona in the first half of August 2022 (number is the same if I change to 1.1.2022-17.8.2022)
---
Additional point: if I look at the year facet, the range is from 2014 to 2023; this seems to be just a display error in the facet, though: when I change it to 2022-2022, the number of hits doesn't drop.
---
On the plus side: facets "From last week" and "From last month" should work correctly now
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment > 500 Maximum Number of Displayed Facets
We're on Primo VE and many facets where alphabetical sort would be much better / easier to grasp than number of hits, but we can't switch to alphabetical display because it only can be used if we're sure the facet won't have more than 50 entries.
An error occurred while saving the comment Thank you for clarifying, Stacey
I understand that parity issues have an additional weight.
An error occurred while saving the comment Why only CDI and not all facets?
-
63 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi
Is this solved by now?
(sorry, won't get notified if you reply)
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment At the moment you'll have to use "*" instead of *
An error occurred while saving the comment Blank search should come in 2020: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/35373859-ability-to-run-blank-search-with-limiters-primo
-
154 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment As this won't happen in Primo VE for performance reasons, maybe the thread could/should be closed as "won't do" to release the votes?
An error occurred while saving the comment Did not make it though round 2 of NERS.
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS 7855, round 2 open for voting now.
An error occurred while saving the comment > This is functionality that I see in other library catalogs
And it's apparently a parity issue compared to Primo BO.
Via the Primo mailing list:
"BO has a top level “Available in the Library” facet to limit your results to just items that are available on shelf, while VE has a similarly named “Held By Library” facet that limits items to physical titles – whether or not they are on shelf."
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS 7855, open for voting now
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
43 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Just to add:
I can do the search from
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Knowledge_Articles/Long_combinations_of_Boolean_operators_and_truncated_terms_(wildcards)_return_0_resultsin our Primo VE (local records only) without triggering "No results found"
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/search?query=any,contains,segregat*%20OR%20isolat*%20OR%20supermax*%20OR%20violen*%20OR%20effect*%20OR%20organ*%20OR%20media*%20OR%20influe*&tab=DiscoveryNetwork&search_scope=DiscoveryNetwork&vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&lang=en&offset=0 -
129 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi
I think this has been fixed in the meantime, because you can (and do) show coverage separately
https://adelphi.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/jsearch?query=any,contains,Journal%20of%20Health%20and%20Social%20Policy&tab=jsearch_slot&vid=01ADELPHI_INST:01ADELPHI_INST&offset=0&journals=any,Journal%20of%20Health%20and%20Social%20Policy -
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment > different URLs depending on the interface language in Primo
That works in Primo VE, but the language part gets lost when you use the Send to: Email' link from the full title display.
-
68 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I understand this wish, but I would rather say:
In addition to the interface language of Primo, also let the patrons choose the language they want to be contacted in.
Reason: just because your interface has several languages doesn't mean that all the texts of your letters/emails have been translated to the same languages.
For example:
Our interface could be in German Italian French and English,
but maybe our letters only have German and English texts.---
The feature also needs to take in account patrons that are managed externally.
@Florianne you do already have the link Stacey is talking about (if I understand it correctly): it's at the end of the details section, called 'Collection path' / 'Chemin d'accès à la collection'
So all Ex Libris would need to do is show this link on the page of the collection, for ecample above the single titles.
(of course it should be a setting that the institution can choose to show or hide)