Suzanne
My feedback
15 results found
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment
Suzanne
commented
It would be nice to sort a set by ANY and as many options as possible based on the type of set content.
Working with sets is incredibly frustrating.
-
0 votes
Suzanne
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes
Suzanne
shared this idea
·
-
50 votes
Suzanne
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Suzanne
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
Suzanne
shared this idea
·
-
7 votes
Suzanne
supported this idea
·
-
181 votes
Suzanne
supported this idea
·
-
106 votes
Suzanne
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Suzanne
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Suzanne
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
Suzanne
shared this idea
·
-
102 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This idea is related to another one - https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173/suggestions/48370850, which was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The…
Suzanne
supported this idea
·
-
135 votes
Suzanne
supported this idea
·
-
135 votes
Suzanne
supported this idea
·
It would also help MAYBE if filters were available. I cant access facets for physical item lists...
Set sorting should also be static and not change every time an object is removed etc.