Carla Buser
My feedback
29 results found
-
5 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to ESV, and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Thanks,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Carla Buser
shared this idea
·
-
204 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
73 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
144 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
-
35 votes
-
60 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to LIBRUMopen, and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Thanks,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
85 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Carla Buser
shared this idea
·
-
46 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
43 votes
Hi Liz,
We would like to better understand the situation of "portfolio changes vendors":
- Does this mean that the interface of the portfolio was changed?
- Is it enough to report this on collection/service level, and not in portfolio level?
- What actions would you take upon such report?
Thanks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
-
421 votes
Thank you for the suggested idea.
After reading it carefully, I understand that the main pain point here is the removal/fix of items already received.
To be more specific, the description of already received items should be updated to reflect the new pattern.
- Is this understanding correct?
- How often such change happens?
- Can you please add examples of the existing description and the needed update?
- Can the 'Update items using Excel load' CloudApp be utilized for fixing the description? see https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/appcenter/item-updater-by-excel/
Thanks for the collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product
-
35 votes
Carla Buser
supported this idea
·
To see the linking information not only after activating a CZ database but already before activation, would help to identify the right database.