Volker Hartmann

My feedback

22 results found

  1. 195 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  2. 111 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  3. 186 votes
    2 comments  ·  RapidILL » Lending  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  4. 229 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  5. 82 votes
    2 comments  ·  RapidILL » Lending  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  6. 116 votes
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
  7. 122 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  8. 152 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello all,

    Alma currently support publishing of a set of records with the enriched related records information. For more information please refer to Related Records Enrichment section (MARC only) section in the online help page.

    Are you aware of this existing capability? Is this not sufficient for your needs?

    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  9. 35 votes
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
  10. 258 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  11. 68 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  12. 241 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hi all, we're working on analyzing the request for batch item description updates and would love your input to make sure our solution fits your needs.

    I would like to propose the following:

    The "Rebuild Physical item description" job currently allows auto-generating a description for a set of items (based on enum/chron data) - this option will be kept as is, but the job would allow selection to either auto-generate the description (existing) or enter a description value as free text (meaning all items in the set would get the same description). The free text option would also support updating the field with an empty value as exists in other jobs.


    1. What are some examples of descriptions that would be relevant across an entire set of items?

    2. As discussed in previous comments, changing the description of an item (manually or via job) causes the pending requests for that…

    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  13. 88 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  14. 317 votes
    13 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  15. 115 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  16. 175 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  17. 566 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  18. 152 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  19. 41 votes
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Volker Hartmann commented  · 

    I'd strongly support it, and would add $c and $d too! The problem is with all first names entries, and that is not only monarchs, but most medieval names. In an entry like Thomas Aquinus Primo only looks for Thomas, there are hundreds of Johannes ..., it is impossible without $b and often without $d.

    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
  20. 78 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Volker Hartmann supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base