Volker Hartmann
My feedback
22 results found
-
195 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
111 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
186 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
229 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
82 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
116 votes
-
122 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
152 votes
Hello all,
Alma currently support publishing of a set of records with the enriched related records information. For more information please refer to Related Records Enrichment section (MARC only) section in the online help page.
Are you aware of this existing capability? Is this not sufficient for your needs?
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
35 votes
-
258 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
68 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
241 votes
Hi all, we're working on analyzing the request for batch item description updates and would love your input to make sure our solution fits your needs.
I would like to propose the following:
The "Rebuild Physical item description" job currently allows auto-generating a description for a set of items (based on enum/chron data) - this option will be kept as is, but the job would allow selection to either auto-generate the description (existing) or enter a description value as free text (meaning all items in the set would get the same description). The free text option would also support updating the field with an empty value as exists in other jobs.
1. What are some examples of descriptions that would be relevant across an entire set of items?
2. As discussed in previous comments, changing the description of an item (manually or via job) causes the pending requests for that…
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
88 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
317 votes
Thank you for this idea.
We are currently examining it and will update once we have more details.
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
115 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
175 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
566 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
152 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
-
78 votes
Volker Hartmann supported this idea ·
I'd strongly support it, and would add $c and $d too! The problem is with all first names entries, and that is not only monarchs, but most medieval names. In an entry like Thomas Aquinus Primo only looks for Thomas, there are hundreds of Johannes ..., it is impossible without $b and often without $d.