Kate Seago
My feedback
23 results found
-
70 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
204 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
43 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Kate Seago
commented
This is something we would like to be able to do.
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
-
38 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
-
50 votes
-
98 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
92 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
116 votes
Dear All,
We are reviewing this idea and would like to ask the following: Do you refer to the "License Terms" that appear on the Discovery?
Thank you,
Zohar Shemesh
Alma Product Team
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
Kate Seago
shared this idea
·
-
14 votes
Kate Seago
supported this idea
·
We have a variety of access models and licenses so the clearer we can make what we own and what the user model is the better.