Matthew Goddard

My feedback

19 results found

  1. 33 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  2. 116 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  3. 235 votes
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  4. 202 votes
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Linked Data  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  6. 41 votes
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  8. 5 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  9. 26 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  10. 156 votes
    How important is this to you?
  11. 33 votes
    How important is this to you?
  12. 799 votes
    11 comments  ·  Content » other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matthew Goddard commented  · 

    This may be an unpopular comment, but I'd be surprised if anyone is in a position to start systematically differentiating between peer-reviewed content WITHIN a journal without bringing in a lot of assumptions and guesswork.

    Instead, my suggestion would be to make it clearer that this label is applied at the level of the journal. Our facet is already called "Peer reviewed journals", not "peer reviewed articles". Another improvement would be to somehow position the peer-reviewed label adjacent to the journal title, rather than alongside other article-level labels like "review article" and "open access" as it is now.

  13. 17 votes
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
  14. 62 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Hello,

    This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.

    It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.

    My sincere apologies.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

  15. 277 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matthew Goddard commented  · 

    When this idea was first suggested seven years ago, there was probably no good way to technically achieve this. There are now multiple solid sources of this data, from organizations willing to share it (Third Iron, Unpaywall, CrossRef, etc.). Data on OA articles in hybrid journals must be integrated into CDI - otherwise search results in Primo are woefully incomplete. This is an urgent problem, as an increasing portion of academic articles are published OA in hybrid journals.

  16. 60 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Matthew Goddard supported this idea  · 
  17. 69 votes
    How important is this to you?
  18. 78 votes
    How important is this to you?
  19. 68 votes
    How important is this to you?

Feedback and Knowledge Base