Matthew Goddard
My feedback
21 results found
-
235 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
195 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to ASME for the collection metadata and setup.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Hi,
We will reach out to IOP and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Regards,
Rachel
Senior Content Support Analyst
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
133 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
51 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
shared this idea
·
-
26 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
153 votes
-
33 votes
-
797 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
commented
This may be an unpopular comment, but I'd be surprised if anyone is in a position to start systematically differentiating between peer-reviewed content WITHIN a journal without bringing in a lot of assumptions and guesswork.
Instead, my suggestion would be to make it clearer that this label is applied at the level of the journal. Our facet is already called "Peer reviewed journals", not "peer reviewed articles". Another improvement would be to somehow position the peer-reviewed label adjacent to the journal title, rather than alongside other article-level labels like "review article" and "open access" as it is now.
-
91 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to Thoth (with the address provided in the comment - thank you!), and will review the available metadata to evaluate our options.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
-
17 votes
-
61 votesAdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
-
276 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
commented
When this idea was first suggested seven years ago, there was probably no good way to technically achieve this. There are now multiple solid sources of this data, from organizations willing to share it (Third Iron, Unpaywall, CrossRef, etc.). Data on OA articles in hybrid journals must be integrated into CDI - otherwise search results in Primo are woefully incomplete. This is an urgent problem, as an increasing portion of academic articles are published OA in hybrid journals.
-
144 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
60 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
-
75 votes
Please note that it is possible to include only records with active electronic inventory in the Primo search index, by using a Custom Local Data Scope with the condition “ Inventory –- Available electronic -– Exists”. More detailed instructions were shared by Kirsti Thomas on the Alma listserv on March 13, 2024.