Matthew Goddard
My feedback
27 results found
-
225 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
191 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
172 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to AMS and ask for these annual collections.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
154 votes
Hello,
We have opened an internal ticket for our cataloging team to analyze the different scenarios.
I will update this idea once our team has formed some options.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to ASME for the collection metadata and setup.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Hi,
We will reach out to IOP and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Regards,
Rachel
Senior Content Support Analyst
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Hello,
This idea was marked as "new provider" so it was not handled until now.
We will reach out to the American Phytopathological Society and ask for the metadata for the book collection.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
81 votesUnder Review ·
AdminShoshana de la Fuente
(Product Manager, Esploro Repository, Ex Libris)
responded
Dear Colleagues,
if the suggested solution available within analytics is not sufficient, please respond with an explanation why. Otherwise we will be closing this idea.
Thank you for your feedback,
Shoshana
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
133 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
shared this idea
·
-
29 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
153 votes
-
33 votes
-
797 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
commented
This may be an unpopular comment, but I'd be surprised if anyone is in a position to start systematically differentiating between peer-reviewed content WITHIN a journal without bringing in a lot of assumptions and guesswork.
Instead, my suggestion would be to make it clearer that this label is applied at the level of the journal. Our facet is already called "Peer reviewed journals", not "peer reviewed articles". Another improvement would be to somehow position the peer-reviewed label adjacent to the journal title, rather than alongside other article-level labels like "review article" and "open access" as it is now.
-
87 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to Thoth (with the address provided in the comment - thank you!), and will review the available metadata to evaluate our options.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
-
17 votes
-
57 votesAdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Please note that it is possible to include only records with active electronic inventory in the Primo search index, by using a Custom Local Data Scope with the condition “ Inventory –- Available electronic -– Exists”. More detailed instructions were shared by Kirsti Thomas on the Alma listserv on March 13, 2024.