Matthew Goddard
My feedback
26 results found
-
114 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
commented
There is currently no way to assign existing PO lines to electronic inventory with a job. We request that PO line be added as a field that can be set using the "Change Electronic Portfolio Information" job.
The job should respect settings about valid inventory for the different PO line types, and should work with closed PO lines. This idea could also be applied to Electronic Collections, but I think there will be fewer cases that require this.
Use case: we have thousands of old PO lines from a previous system without inventory, and thousands of portfolios lacking their order data. Manually assigning each PO line to its portfolio is not a good use of our time, but leaving the data "as is" is also not a good option.
-
130 votes
Hello,
We are working with East View to streamline their planned platform change.
You can also track the updates in the Known Issues platform:
https://supportcenter.clarivate.com/s/known-issues/knowledge-detail?language=en_US&recordId=kA2QO00000108Ej0AI
I will post here once the migration is completed.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to Project MUSE to request the metadata for this collection.
At this stage, we are not certain that excluding the open access titles would be the best approach, as it may be more beneficial for the community to have all CEU Press content available within a single collection rather than activating these titles across multiple collections. We will review this internally to ensure alignment with the structure of other Knowledgebase collections.
Thank you,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Matthew Goddard
shared this idea
·
-
39 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
196 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
commented
Wholeheartedly support this idea in principle. However, I would urge Ex Libris to implement this as an additional value in the access type field (current, perpetual, etc.), rather than a new field. It seems to me to fit well with the concept of "access type", and OA content does not fit perfectly into either of the current/perpetual buckets.
There are already too many disparate ways of flagging free/OA content, and another field is likely to make things even more confusing and difficult to manage.
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
49 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
204 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
112 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
115 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
128 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesMatthew Goddard
shared this idea
·
-
40 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
200 votes
AdminAdina Marciano
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Thank you for the suggested idea. We see its value and will consider it in the future. This development requires integration with third-party providers, and we will need to investigate the possibility of this development.
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
44 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
60 votes
Hello,
Unfortunately, the CDI feed has been delayed and currently there is no timeline for it.
I apologize for the lapse in communication, and hope to have a clear schedule to share soon.
Kind regards,
Tamar
Matthew Goddard
shared this idea
·
-
32 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
166 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
Tamar, thanks for pointing that out. That is a better idea, since the job I'm referencing here is not designed to populate a different value for each portfolio. If it's possible to delete this one, I'd appreciate it.