Terri Ann Coronel
My feedback
13 results found
-
64 votes
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
204 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
Terri Ann Coronel
shared this idea
·
-
17 votes
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Terri Ann Coronel
shared this idea
·
-
199 votes
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
150 votes
-
213 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thanks you for suggesting this idea.
After reading it carefully, my understanding is that the need is for a new “entity” which will serve as a “bridge” between encumbrance and expenditure. This bridge will be named “Pending invoices”.
Any POL which is invoiced will be disencumbered and the amount will be added to the “pending invoices balance”. When an invoice is approved, the amount should be reduced from the “pending invoices balance” and added as an expenditure.
- Is this understanding correct?
- Do you think that the definition of using this "bridge" should be in institution level, or might be different from invoice to invoice?
Please note that this is a complicated addition. We will need to define the behavior in rollover, and in any place that changes balances etc.
Thanks for your collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
802 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
106 votes
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·
-
116 votes
Dear All,
We are reviewing this idea and would like to ask the following: Do you refer to the "License Terms" that appear on the Discovery?
Thank you,
Zohar Shemesh
Alma Product Team
Terri Ann Coronel
supported this idea
·