Debra Juarez
My feedback
13 results found
-
30 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
122 votes
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
165 votes
Dear all,
Thank you for sharing this idea.
I have read it carefully, and would like to make sure that I understand it:
Current situation:
There are several processes in PO line workflow which add automatic internal notes, for example:
- Renewal ("PO Line has been renewed automatically on…")
- Moving PO line out of PO (""Line was removed from Order ...")
- other.
Desired outcome:
Have a configurable option to disable these notes from being created. Each of these processes is/will be saved in the PO line history.
Please let me know if this understanding is correct.
Thanks,
Zohar Shemesh
Alma product team
An error occurred while saving the comment
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
Debra Juarez
shared this idea
·
-
59 votes
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Reopened as requested by customer.
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
Debra Juarez
shared this idea
·
-
81 votes
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
213 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thanks you for suggesting this idea.
After reading it carefully, my understanding is that the need is for a new “entity” which will serve as a “bridge” between encumbrance and expenditure. This bridge will be named “Pending invoices”.
Any POL which is invoiced will be disencumbered and the amount will be added to the “pending invoices balance”. When an invoice is approved, the amount should be reduced from the “pending invoices balance” and added as an expenditure.
- Is this understanding correct?
- Do you think that the definition of using this "bridge" should be in institution level, or might be different from invoice to invoice?
Please note that this is a complicated addition. We will need to define the behavior in rollover, and in any place that changes balances etc.
Thanks for your collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
-
159 votes
Debra Juarez
supported this idea
·
This is also true for one-time orders.