Fiona Tinto
My feedback
-
97 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
48 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
148 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
26 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
163 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
21 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
54 votes
Hello,
Thank you for explaining this use-case. We will approach the provider and discuss our options to address this matter.
Thank you,
Rael
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Fiona Tinto shared this idea ·
-
32 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
91 votes
Anonymous responded
Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
55 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Fiona Tinto commented
Agreed - it would be great if you could move an Interface Record from one vendor record to another rather than having to delete and recreate against an other record.
-
77 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Fiona Tinto shared this idea ·
-
53 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
114 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
Fiona Tinto shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Fiona Tinto shared this idea ·
-
45 votes
Fiona Tinto supported this idea ·
*edit to above - I should have made this clearer that is is in relation to Primo Central. Adding the EZproxy base URL means it will be applied to all Link in Record type Primo Central resources. I would like more granularity so that we could choose to apply the proxy to specific Link in Record type Primo Central collections, but not others.