Fiona Tinto
My feedback
14 results found
-
204 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
50 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
51 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
95 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
182 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
25 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
16 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
12 votesFiona Tinto shared this idea ·
-
62 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
94 votesAnonymous responded
Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers
Fiona Tinto supported this idea · -
56 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Fiona Tinto commentedAgreed - it would be great if you could move an Interface Record from one vendor record to another rather than having to delete and recreate against an other record.
-
9 votesFiona Tinto shared this idea ·
-
56 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
-
269 votesFiona Tinto supported this idea ·
*edit to above - I should have made this clearer that is is in relation to Primo Central. Adding the EZproxy base URL means it will be applied to all Link in Record type Primo Central resources. I would like more granularity so that we could choose to apply the proxy to specific Link in Record type Primo Central collections, but not others.