Skip to content

Johanna Looft

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

11 results found

  1. Allow comparison with specific collection(s) with uploaded files in Collection overlap analysis –

    18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johanna Looft commented  · 

    Dear Pauline Liu,

    the text (AENH-I-36732) is as follows:

    "Collection Development tool needs to allow location-based comparisons as well

    The Collection Development Tool unfortunately does not yet allow comparisons within a single Alma library. While subsets (e.g., holdings from one location) can be passed via list, set, or special definition in a project, no other complementary location belonging to the same Alma library can be used on the comparison side. Only comparisons with complete inventory from one or more other libraries within the same IZ are allowed.

    Location-based comparison should generally be permitted within the same library as a project definition option, set or file as well as for comparison quantities. On comparison side it would be useful, to be allowed to integrate an Alma set, to import a file or to define the parameters of data to take into comparison. At the moment, comparison is library based and those data identified as present in the same library is taken off the comparisons. Our locations are quite large ones (masses of items), and there is a need to compare inventory from location A with inventory from location B (same library)."

    Perhaps Your idea concerns electronic material. The above described requirement concern physical inventory.

    Have a nice day!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johanna Looft commented  · 

    Dear Pauline Liu, does Your proposal refer on similar suggestions described here? https://enhancements.exlibrisusers.org/ideas/AENH-I-36732
    Should we probably put our wishes into bundles, that offer the chance to be supported by practitioner groups when it comes to votings?

    Johanna Looft supported this idea  · 

  2. Fee block: automatic blocking and unblocking

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - Fines &Fees  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johanna Looft supported this idea  · 

  3. Alma as a linked entity User Interface

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Linked Data  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johanna Looft supported this idea  · 

  4. The line separator in Analytics outputs is normally a semicolon, but should not be ambiguous

    64 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johanna Looft commented  · 

    In order to avoid missunderstandings: a specific line separator (whenever a MARC field is repeated within a bibliographic description) is necessary. What is missleading concerning further processing is the ambiguous use of a character in data exports.

    Johanna Looft shared this idea  · 

  5. Enable reporting and filtering in Alma Analytics based on specific MARC indicator values by exposing them as separate, filterable fields

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johanna Looft supported this idea  · 

  6. The "maximum renewal date" (max_renew_date) should be part of the fields that are provided by API

    61 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » APIs and Integrations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johanna Looft supported this idea  · 

  7. Please integrate aspect „last copy within library / IZ / NZ“ within “Withdraw Physical Items” process

    100 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johanna Looft shared this idea  · 

  8. Make the amount of a user account's TOTAL outstanding fees a feature in the Fines/Fees Notification Profiles

    59 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - Fines &Fees  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johanna Looft supported this idea  · 

  9. Save certain subfields from being overwritten via F3 and PTC

    262 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Alma » Metadata Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello everyone, for those who raised comments about the correction of 830 $v, could you please provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of the scenario in which this subfield gets overwritten?

    Johanna Looft supported this idea  · 

  10. Optimize call number Advanced Search

    71 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johanna Looft supported this idea  · 

  11. Add an ability to change the "owning library" at acquisitions level

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Johanna Looft supported this idea  ·