Andii Johnson
My feedback
20 results found
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
118 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Andii Johnson
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Andii Johnson
shared this idea
·
-
8 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
Andii Johnson
shared this idea
·
-
9 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
AdminTami Ezra
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
Andii Johnson
supported this idea
·
Going from "online ahead of print" to published necessitates a few metadata changes. I definitely agree, we'd need to be able to verify those updates. I like the idea of a monthly report with the ability to process the metadata update to the record the way we approve and dedupe authors - Either process the update as is or make a manual update. I wonder if that would work with assets.