Catherine Riches
My feedback
25 results found
-
8 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesCatherine Riches
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesCatherine Riches
shared this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
4 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
0 votes
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
Yes please - I've mentioned this to ExLibris directly but had not got round to creating an Idea. This is really illogical and misleading - our current Reading Lists Task List shows 1765 'Unassigned' lists, but then the breakdown shows 1729 of these are 'Unassigned - complete' thus they do not need any work and should not be listed as tasks. But there are other statuses we would like to be able to include as incomplete, eg one we created manually called 'Library query in progress' to indicate that we have paused the list review whilst we wait to hear back from another colleague/team with info that will allow us to continue the review. Being able to configure this list would allow a more accurate snapshot of the lists still in some stage of processing.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesCatherine Riches
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesCatherine Riches
shared this idea
·
-
29 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
We would find this very helpful too. For example, to prioritise reading list reviewing workloads, we would like to be able to filter to all course terms appropriate to a certain time of year where the list is 'ready for processing', but currently cannot do this.
Eg in Semester 1 we'd like to select all course terms other than 'Semester 2' - we have some courses that run all year long or across years, so we always want to see these whatever the time of year, but we'd like to be able to filter out those that only run in semester 1 or 2, depending on the time of year.
Currently we just have to leave them all visible and advise people to ignore the ones we'd like to filter out, but it would be a lot better to be able to select multiple options in a facet group to easily see workloads and avoid chance of something less urgent being picked up by mistake.Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
97 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
This would be very welcome. We need to be able to see things as a member of academic staff would, for the reasons Lyn has listed and also general troubleshooting/support.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesCatherine Riches
shared this idea
·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
We'd find this useful too, for the exact same purpose. Though we would need the ability to set it by role level, so library staff can add this tag more than once at our discretion, as we do have some exceptions where certain modules/reading lists have access to more than one eTextbook. But stopping academics from requesting more than one per list would mean less chasing and cleanup for library staff.
-
39 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesCatherine Riches
shared this idea
·
-
45 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
I think this may be the same as idea https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/395697-leganto/suggestions/48647015-new-ui-please-allow-institutions-to-customise-th (although that is slightly broader about being able to customise the options shown in the Add menu in general, it is the Import References one specifically that was mentioned as something it would be preferable to disable). I found this last week when going through ideas I had voted on ahead of the 2026 CERVs.
I also raised a support case on this issue a couple of months ago (08266502) and was directed by ExL to yet another older idea (https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/395697-leganto/suggestions/46301143-allow-configuration-of-list-level-import-options) which does not have any votes - presumably because it was superseded by the first one I mentioned above and ideas exchange is difficult to navigate.
In any case I'm happy so many institutions want this, it's strange we can't hide a feature that we do not want to advertise as it just creates cleanup work for library staff! We were advised all we could do was edit the wording of the label to include 'not currently in use' which we have done, but I think looks confusing.