Catherine Riches
My feedback
21 results found
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
55 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
This would be very welcome. We need to be able to see things as a member of academic staff would, for the reasons Lyn has listed and also general troubleshooting/support.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesCatherine Riches
shared this idea
·
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
We'd find this useful too, for the exact same purpose. Though we would need the ability to set it by role level, so library staff can add this tag more than once at our discretion, as we do have some exceptions where certain modules/reading lists have access to more than one eTextbook. But stopping academics from requesting more than one per list would mean less chasing and cleanup for library staff.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
118 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
Yes please. We really don't want to have multiple editions of a book cited separately in Leganto as it can cause clutter and confusion, but occasionally an academic will add a student note about other eds being fine to use and it'd be tidier to have these showing on the one citation in a tab, as described above.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesCatherine Riches
shared this idea
·
-
14 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
44 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
92 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
87 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
This would be extremely useful - it is currently very fiddly trying to identify the citations from a collection where we have lost access/will soon lose access. We've tried searching specific linking info in the URL of the 'electronic location & access' field, or combining reports of portfolio IDs & corresponding MMS IDs against citations using MMS ID as a match, but I don't think either of these are foolproof and it would be so much more straightforward to just include electronic collection in the Course Reserves area of Analytics.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
74 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
91 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to Thoth (with the address provided in the comment - thank you!), and will review the available metadata to evaluate our options.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
47 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
We would find this very helpful too. For example, to prioritise reading list reviewing workloads, we would like to be able to filter to all course terms appropriate to a certain time of year where the list is 'ready for processing', but currently cannot do this.
Eg in Semester 1 we'd like to select all course terms other than 'Semester 2' - we have some courses that run all year long or across years, so we always want to see these whatever the time of year, but we'd like to be able to filter out those that only run in semester 1 or 2, depending on the time of year.
Currently we just have to leave them all visible and advise people to ignore the ones we'd like to filter out, but it would be a lot better to be able to select multiple options in a facet group to easily see workloads and avoid chance of something less urgent being picked up by mistake.