Catherine Riches
My feedback
20 results found
-
31 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
95 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
74 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
We are planning to display additional metadata in the instructor and librarian view, but we are still working on the final details. We will update once we finalize.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
25 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
78 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
This would be extremely useful - it is currently very fiddly trying to identify the citations from a collection where we have lost access/will soon lose access. We've tried searching specific linking info in the URL of the 'electronic location & access' field, or combining reports of portfolio IDs & corresponding MMS IDs against citations using MMS ID as a match, but I don't think either of these are foolproof and it would be so much more straightforward to just include electronic collection in the Course Reserves area of Analytics.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
71 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
81 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
84 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
47 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
Yes, it is restrictive to have only two fixed fields. I would like it to reflect the UK Digital Content Store request form (the DCS being the place where digitisations and copyright are managed), where we are able to enter a string of page numbers in a single field and it calculates the total, eg '4-7,9,12,15-21'. Often requests are for a set of short extracts, it is not practical to place new requests for each of these and makes the list unwieldy. If the Leganto request popup could reflect the DCS form it would make integration much smoother. Currently the requester has to put the list of page numbers in the notes field of the request, and we then manually add these to the correct field in the DCS. It would be great if it automatically populated from the initial request form.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Catherine Riches
commented
This would be helpful because in Alma (Reading List Tasks List) there is no facet/filter for a course with no year, so reading lists without years added effectively become invisible if using this filter. We want to ensure all lists have a year attached, so these can be differentiated in an annual PDF export.
Catherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
107 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
66 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesCatherine Riches
supported this idea
·
I'm late to the party, but glad this has been accepted, as I sent this as feedback after the initial webinar of the new UI back in December 2022. Just wanted to add, we would also find it useful for tags to be editable without extra clicks as well, as in the classic UI. Often library staff come across a list where an academic has not tagged certain items, and it's currently quick to add reading importance tags where these citations are already in corresponding sections. It would be a pain to have to do this with extra clicks. It would also make it harder to get academics to add tags retrospectively if it takes twice the time. Additionally, there are a couple of tags we use internally to flag something for action from another team, and these are later removed when completed - again annoying if it takes longer. As ExLibris are reviewing the instructor view, I'd love the option to show 'Add Tag' at list view level without having to click to expand.