Skip to content

Rebecca Cooke

My feedback

21 results found

  1. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    An update: Ex Libris suggested using the Asset Licences section to store local copyright permissions. While we can do this and have been advised that there is no limit to the number of licences we can add, the copyright statement does not print out on the PDF coverpage. Therefore this is not a solution to storing local copyright permissions.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    During our migration to Esploro this topic was raised, and we were advised that there would be functionality to allow a local lookup that sat next to, or instead of, the Sherpa/Romeo lookup. Having said this, now that I've used the Sherpa lookup I wouldn't want to replace it with a local lookup. Using the licence feature is an interesting option and one that I will investigate further, although we have received hundreds of local permissions and I don't want to make the licences too cumbersome to use.

    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  2. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    I realise this has been done for affiliations, but it would be good to also have this for creator role as well.

  3. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    This would be very welcome, especially for internal promotion rounds where a CV is required to be included with the promotion application.

    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  4. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    This would be very welcome at our institution, as would linking media mentions to other entities, such as projects.

  5. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    We also run into this issue for executive that have a generic email (such as "headofschool@usc.edu.au") that they wish to use instead of their personal email.

  6. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    This would be good. We also have a user for 'ineligible' assets so that we don't have to investigate them again if the researcher re-submits. It would be good to be able to filter these off as well when searching for legitimate deposits.

    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  7. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    A feature such as this would save us a lot of time, where we currently need to delete (which isn't a quick task in itself!) and readd to the other section. Much needed.

  8. 54 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    This is totally needed in order to make these forms acceptable for use in our institution. Particularly the ability to remove the co-authors field from the form.

    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  9. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  10. 61 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  11. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    Hi Tami, last time we tested this both the DC and QDC produced the same output, which is why I think it is unusable for harvesting. If the QDC could be mapped with greater granularity, that may work.

    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  12. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  13. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  14. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Esploro » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  15. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  16. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  17. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    Hi Dan, I would expect all core publication metadata (parent publication, publisher, date, ISBN/ISSN, conference information) to be copied over as well as the editors if there are any. The authors, title, page numbers, abstract, keywords, etc, would be blank. Thanks, Bec

    Rebecca Cooke shared this idea  · 
  18. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Cooke commented  · 

    I agree. As it stands at the moment the workflow has double handling, along with the lag time of opening the creator record. I also think it would be good to be able to add the affiliation for a researcher for which there is no affiliation saved, instead of having to go back into the creator on a record to edit afterwards.

    Rebecca Cooke supported this idea  · 
  19. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke shared this idea  · 
  20. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Cooke shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base