Peta Hopkins

My feedback

109 results found

  1. 7 votes
    2 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    I'm out of votes, but I like the idea of this one too.

  2. 61 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Peta Hopkins shared this idea  · 
  3. 17 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    May be coming with a parameter in Leganto July release -- as per Leganto user group list message.

    Peta Hopkins shared this idea  · 
  4. 80 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    This appears to be working for me now. If it has been resolved could this idea be set to complete?

  5. 5 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Peta Hopkins supported this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Peta Hopkins supported this idea  · 
  7. 21 votes
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    No votes left, but an interesting idea. We are also wondering about mechanisms for program level view of list resources.

  8. 42 votes
    3 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    +1 I am out of votes, but could use this feature.

  9. 3 votes
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    Yes please. Our use case - we have rolled over citations with physical items and an uploaded chapter file. Because they are physical they automatically go to complete despite the fact that a file has been uploaded for an individual chapter.

    Perhaps the order of applying the statuses could be configurable. File upload trumps all!

  10. 122 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Peta Hopkins supported this idea  · 
  11. 38 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    @Manu_Schwendener - it looks like there is some progress with <strong> tags at least. However when I move one of our links which has an <img> into the ViewIt section that does not work. Similarly with How to
    Get it.
    So it looks like some tags are supported, but not all the ones that work in the Links section.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    There are also implications for how they display in Leganto - Screenshot https://www.screencast.com/t/zFm2wzSL8hr

    Peta Hopkins shared this idea  · 
  12. 8 votes
    2 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    +1

  13. 23 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Peta Hopkins supported this idea  · 
  14. 72 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    I see in the CampusM roadmap that there is an H2 2024 development for Primo VE - Compatibility with New PrimoVE UI . I wonder if this would address this idea.

  15. 28 votes
    6 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    +1

  16. 44 votes
    2 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    +1 - there are times when we would like to display different messages to educators and students concurrently

  17. 22 votes
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    +1 the option to save logical sets of citations in the same way Rapido does would be great. Users could create their own favourite logical sets to quickly access them and streamline their work. Admin/manager could create shared logical sets too.

  18. 157 votes
    5 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    If you like this idea, please consider if this new one would be a workable solution. https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/395697-leganto/suggestions/47579414-make-subjects-usable

    Or maybe the study program needs to be an additional field rather than using the subjects/discipline field.

  19. 2 votes
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peta Hopkins commented  · 

    I noticed that an old idea about sites being able to manage their own subjects got 173 votes and was completed so I imagine there could be good interest in this. https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/395697-leganto/suggestions/34522564-ability-to-maintain-our-own-subject-lists

    Peta Hopkins shared this idea  · 
  20. 5 votes
    1 comment  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Peta Hopkins supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base