Skip to content

Rosetta

Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Rosetta by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.

We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.

For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

104 results found

  1. Dubai: Chart Your Course to Success with Business Plan Writing UAE

    Dubai's business world glitters with possibility, but a clear roadmap is crucial. Business Plan Writing UAE equips you to navigate this dynamic market. Our expert writers craft compelling plans that resonate with Dubai's unique landscape and regulations. We'll tailor your strategy to attract investors and secure funding, transforming your vision into a thriving reality in Dubai.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. embroidered logo hats

    With this sheets of celluloid laid over paper, Pro Digitizing UK offers the best embroidered logo hats in a variety of styles that mimic embroidery without the cost or skill required to produce embroidery digitizing.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Woven Labels For Clothing

    Custom Badges UK provides the best woven labels for clothing in different types to simulate enamel without the expense or expertise needed to make enamel badges, thin sheets of celluloid placed over paper.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. locked

    Would like an ability to remove 'locks' on IEs based on a set.

    Currently i am requred to subit a case to support to get this work doine.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Administration  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Make 100-hour process timeout configurable

    Currently, there is a 100-hour timeout for processes and one of our larger IEs is hitting that time during the export process and so we can't get it out of the system without writing scripts to pull the files from the server directly. It would be great if we could temporarily turn off the timeout so that we can run this process and then put it back. This was discussed in the 2022 Rosetta Working Group meeting as something that would be fairly simple to implement (similar to a new option when running the OAI harvesting).

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. system checks

    I have been running the system checks via the 'Rosetta Administration' -- when the job runs to completion you do not get an alert that the job has completed with no issues other that the 'No records were found' message

    This may cause confusion especially if when accessing the 'System Checks' the message 'No records were found' is already being displayed

    This is not an issue but it would be nice to get feedback that after running the system checks that no issues were found.

    It may even be great to get a checkbox against each of the actions showing…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Administration  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. File level access restrictions to be inherited from PM/MM REP to AD REP

    we are using access restriction on file level for some of our items. For PM REP we can assign this automatically via task chain, but this approach does not work for AD REP (tasks cannot be used). Unfortunately when there are files in PM REP with access restriction, this access restriction is not inherited/copied to AD REP during the enrichment process. So we need to go to AD REP and manually add/change the AR for the files which need to have it.
    It would be great if we have either have a task chain which would copy the file restrictions…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Full Validation Stack for BYTESTREAM Objects

    We have a growing number of deposits where data enters the archive in container formats such as .zip and is usually not extracted for various reasons. Examples include zip containers which are part of a larger complex object IE such as the content of a CD or a as zipped supplementary data to a journal article where the zip container is referenced from with the publication.

    In this case, files in BYTESTREAM are extracted during ingest for metadata extraction, but are stored as container formats in permanent. But there are some shortcomings compared to the regular validation stack:

    • no…

    33 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Ingest  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Allow Rosetta to be exposed as a non-root URL

    Our Rosetta instances are all behind a firewall and accessible through a reverse proxy.

    In order to sanitize our host names and improve the integration with our other services, it would be beneficiary to be able to access Rosetta in a sub-path of an existing URL. So instead of the url: test.depot.libis.be/mng/... we would like to use teneo.libis.be/depot/test/mng/...

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Exclude file level dmdSec from publishing

    We use the out of the box Update Metadata Job fairly regularly. The first part of that job is to run a publishing configuration that outputs the XML to the server. We'd like the option to exclude the file level dmdSecs from publishing, as we have some IEs with thousands and it results in a very large XML file that is difficult to work with. We generally only need to edit the IE level dmdSec so the additional XML is unnecessary.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Web Services: 1. new argument for SOAP/REST: institution code / 2. general limitation of answers to content of a certain institution

    Hello,

    we would like to limit the content delivered by a SOAP/REST request to data belonging to a certain institution.

    We assume there are several ways to reach this goal.

    1. A first approach could be to introduce a new argument ("institutionCode") similar to producer ID:
      <arg2 xmlns=""></arg2> //producerID
      as used in e.g. getDepositActivityBySubmitDate

    2. Regarding a more fundamental solution:
      As a constortial leader we are especially interested in functionalities that support Rosetta's multi-tenancy approach.
      Therefore we would welcome a general limitation of web service request answers to content of the institution of the requesting user.

    Thanks for your considerations

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  APIs & Plug-ins  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. DCReplacePlugin

    Enhance DCReplacePlugin to be able to replace empty/NULL values from the DC field replace value

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  APIs & Plug-ins  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. multi-client capability for external migration in Preservation Plan

    In a preservation plan it is possible to migrate objects using external alternatives. To do this, the objects are exported, migrated externally and then re-imported.
    Unfortunately it is not possible to configure the export path. Therefore it is also not possible to perform migrations separated by institution. At other places in Rosetta this is already implemented. For example, an export path can be entered when exporting an IE. To enable Rosetta's multi-client capability, it would be necessary to separate by institution when exporting in the Preservation Plan.

    17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Allow export of all instances of an element from Search for Objects

    When you use the "Search for Objects" from the Data Management menu you can customize the columns and then export those columns easily to a CSV file. One issue we have is that only the first instance of an element is displayed and exported. For example, if we have multiple occurrences of dc:identifier only the first one will show and be exported. We would like all instances of each element to be included - perhaps with a separator like a semi-colon (or something else).

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. UX: improve list view of IE delivery rules

    The IE delivery rule list contains the following fields:
    - active
    - name
    - description
    - creation date
    - modification date
    - commands view, edit and delete

    the dates and commands take up half of the screen, not leaving much space for the name and description. Both these fields are rarely descriptive enough to fully understand the implication of the rule and we have had several occasions where an operator added a rule, changed the order or modified a rule without understanding its impact. Resulting in wrong viewers being used or even files not viewable at all.

    We think the…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Administration  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Material flow simplification by making things optional

    Currently the material flow combines amongst others, a restrictive list of access rights, retention policies and metadata fields. These operate as restrictions on which access rights, retention policies and metadata fields can be supplied by the submitter. We suggest to make it possible to opt-out on any of these restrictions. That would benefit customers that have automated submission workflows outside of Rosetta where the metadata is already checked for validity and fully under control. It would also help solving human errors when new ARs are created, but forgotten to be added to their respective material flows. If it not possible…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Rosetta REST API to Retreive IE

    Would like a REST API which will retrieve a Rosetta IE METS record

    You can retrieve the METS by adding 'dps_func=mets' to the delivery URL -

    https://digital.slq.qld.gov.au/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?change_lng=en&dps_pid=IE305955&dps_func=mets

    however, the delivery manager will not deliver the METS information if there is are access rights preventing the delivery of the digital asset

    so would like a way to retrieve the METS data regardless of the access rights on the asset

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  APIs & Plug-ins  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Additional Rosetta Collections REST API

    The current Rosetta REST APIs return infromation about a collection structure.

    We would like a REST API which will return all of the IEs attached to a Rosetta Collection

    The information is currently stored in the Oracle VIEW COLLECTIONMEMBERSVIEW

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Preservation Sets - Search levels IE/REP/FILE

    as a preservation manager I would appreciate to be able to switch between the search levels IE/REP/FILE when working with Preservation Sets.
    I agree, that migrations are on file level, but it would be helpful to know how many IEs/which IEs are involved in a Preservation Set. The test set also shows a list of IEs. Furthermore a lot of information for toubleshouting comes on IE-Level: view problematic IEs, view skipped objects, reports on locked IEs,...

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. BagIt-Validation based on 1.0 standart

    By manuel ingest, the validation of Bag according to 1.0 standard, is not fully supported. It does not check the tag manifest file checksums for their correctness. Maybe there are some other holes which you can add in a comment.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Ingest  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base