Rosetta
Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Rosetta by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.
We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.
For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.
407 results found
-
Allow Retention Policy to not delete automatically
Besides of having the option to delete or delete permanently, a retention policy should also allow not to delete at all. Many institutions want to assign a retention period to their objects, but do not want to delete the IEs when the retention period is over. Instead they expect to receive a report where they can decide themselves which objects should be deleted.
17 votes -
Allow full-text searching of all objects in an IE, not just one at a time.
There is a way to have Primo index the full text of PDFs that are in Rosetta which can help a user find which Rosetta IE has a document containing their term/phrase but then once the user clicks through to the Rosetta viewer there is no way for the user to know where their search term appears. Having the search term come through to the viewer would be great, but that would only work when there are a few PDFs. For IEs that contain dozens of PDFs the user would have to open each one and search for their term.…
34 votes -
make
As the set of supported operating systems is known and limited, it would be great to have a Rosetta installation path that uses the distributions' packet manager (e. g. yum) for the initial installation and all upgrade processes. This could facilitate disaster recovery, improve availability and reduce the time needed for upgrades (you could just run "yum upgrade"). DB connectivity etc. could be checked during the package installation.
7 votes -
Support Indexing of Date Range
Enable indexing of a range between start and end values.
4 votes
Adi Alter
responded
Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers
-
Validation Stack to Flag Problems as Warnings, not Errors, and Move them to Permanent
Ability to run the validation stack during ingest, but only flagging warnings, not errors. All IEs will be moved to the permanent repositories and if needed, the problems will be dealt with in a future stage.
23 votes
Adi Alter
responded
Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers
-
Support Publishing Scheduling on an Institutional Level
Possibility to run publishing jobs on the Insitutional level rather than on the consortia level.
9 votes
Adi Alter
responded
Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers
-
Deactivate Institution
Enable deleting an institution that had content already deposited into it. This should be enabled only if all the IEs were already deleted.
3 votes
Adi Alter
responded
Submitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers
- Don't see your idea?