J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
My feedback
20 results found
-
25 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
85 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
144 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
102 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
commented
I strongly support this idea. A start month or even a start date would be very helpful.
In November I was setting up a report, which is to be sent once every year at the beginning of February. I had to wait until the beginning of January in order to schedule it correctly. -
30 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
121 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
78 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
shared this idea
·
-
75 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
commented
In addition to that, we'd also greatly appreciate the addition of the reporting codes in the po line claim letter (respectively in all acq letters in which they aren't available yet).
-
70 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
commented
Additionally, the Claiming Grace Period (days) from the PO line would be very helpful. This would enable better POL clean-up, for example in preparation for switching from manual to automatic claiming.
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
43 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
44 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
shared this idea
·
-
10 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
89 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)
supported this idea
·
Great idea! We could really use this to reduce duplicate purchases in acquisitions in our IZ. Our staff users have purchasing rights scoped to certain libraries. When they want to order a certain title, they do see, if there's an order attached to it already from a different library, however they cannot view it in order to tell, if it's was received or cancelled, or if it's even a subscription.