Carly Anderson
My feedback
8 results found
-
272 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The difference from option 1 is that when an item…
Carly Anderson
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesCarly Anderson
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesCarly Anderson
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Carly Anderson
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesCarly Anderson
shared this idea
·
-
128 votesCarly Anderson
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesCarly Anderson
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesCarly Anderson
supported this idea
·
This is a good idea so that patron's always get their loan receipt notices but patron's don't like getting inundated with a lot of notices at once. If the loans could still be bundled into one e-mail but still send without hitting 'Done', that would be ideal.