Anonymous
My feedback
15 results found
-
318 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
12 votesAdminTamar Ganor (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Anonymous supported this idea · -
9 votesAdminTamar Ganor (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Anonymous supported this idea · -
83 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
52 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea · -
42 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedThis would also be very useful to filter for Open Access resources.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
18 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
87 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to Thoth (with the address provided in the comment - thank you!), and will review the available metadata to evaluate our options.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Anonymous supported this idea · -
412 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
275 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
145 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedI agree with this proposal, also for the Database Search. I understand that clicking on a link launches an advanced search in Primo (outside the Database Search and Journals AtoZ), but if users were directed to a new browser tab then I don't think it would be too confusing for them.
-
64 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedI also just had a staff member ask about this. Seems self-evident and should be a simple fix. I hope this idea gets more visibility.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
102 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
42 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedThis is related to another idea, enabling the access model setting at the collection level. If I had to choose between the two I'd rather add this information at the collection level, as there would be no need to do batch updating if this information were inherited from the collection: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/43836699-collection-level-access-model-setting.
However, it would be useful to be able to batch updates as well, to retroactively update collections involving various access models (EBSCO and ProQuest for example). -
118 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
It was possible to add portfolios to the database search in Primo BO but no longer when we switched to VE. We had to change a number of portfolios into local databases. In some cases this should have been done anyway (we emptied our "Miscellaneous ebooks/journals collections) but in others it was a nuissance.