Anonymous
My feedback
10 results found
-
12 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
42 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
This would also be very useful to filter for Open Access resources.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
421 votes
Thank you for the suggested idea.
After reading it carefully, I understand that the main pain point here is the removal/fix of items already received.
To be more specific, the description of already received items should be updated to reflect the new pattern.
- Is this understanding correct?
- How often such change happens?
- Can you please add examples of the existing description and the needed update?
- Can the 'Update items using Excel load' CloudApp be utilized for fixing the description? see https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/appcenter/item-updater-by-excel/
Thanks for the collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
271 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
I also just had a staff member ask about this. Seems self-evident and should be a simple fix. I hope this idea gets more visibility.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
104 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
120 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
It was possible to add portfolios to the database search in Primo BO but no longer when we switched to VE. We had to change a number of portfolios into local databases. In some cases this should have been done anyway (we emptied our "Miscellaneous ebooks/journals collections) but in others it was a nuissance.