Natacha Bossi
My feedback
24 results found
-
22 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
79 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
70 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
55 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
43 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
187 votes
Hello all,
We are currently reviewing it to assess its technical feasibility and implications. We’ll follow up once we have more clarity.
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
66 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
100 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
88 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
73 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
65 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
107 votes
As you all know, the Community Zone content is shared among all Alma customers, each with different requirements. Therefore, I’m not sure this request would be acceptable to the wider Alma community. That said, if there were a consensus on a closed list of fields that CZ bibliographic records should be restricted from deleting per MARC profile, this capability already exists and is managed by the Ex Libris Content Operations team. Unfortunately, this is not available for authorities. Do you think such a consensus could be reached?
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
102 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
236 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
52 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
88 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
85 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
100 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·