Natacha Bossi
My feedback
29 results found
-
31 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
49 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
167 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
364 votes
Could you please clarify whether this request refers to communication between consortia (Network Zone) members regarding their shared data?
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
129 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
122 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
22 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
119 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
82 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
57 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
80 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
100 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
88 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
76 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
66 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
107 votes
As you all know, the Community Zone content is shared among all Alma customers, each with different requirements. Therefore, I’m not sure this request would be acceptable to the wider Alma community. That said, if there were a consensus on a closed list of fields that CZ bibliographic records should be restricted from deleting per MARC profile, this capability already exists and is managed by the Ex Libris Content Operations team. Unfortunately, this is not available for authorities. Do you think such a consensus could be reached?
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
107 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
31 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·
-
244 votes
Natacha Bossi supported this idea ·