Anonymous
My feedback
9 results found
-
46 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
81 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
152 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
I would like to be able to run Analytics reports on deleted purchase requests. Currently, deleted purchase requests are not available in Analytics. Therefore, we don't want to delete any of our hundreds of purchase requests because we'd lose the ability to generate Analytics reports on them. Having hundreds of old purchase requests accumulate in Alma becomes unwieldy.
-
109 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
150 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
120 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
I agree that the Primo holdings file should include print journals. When loading holdings during Primo searches, It would be helpful if physical holdings and their dates were verified in Alma and only displayed in Primo when there's a match. For example, the systems don't currently match an article's date in a PCI record against physical holdings so physical holdings could display as available even though they don't match the article date. This is confusing to our users since they might think we have an article in a print journal when we really don't. In summary, Primo records should only display print holdings for an article when the dates match.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
There should be functionality parity between regular Primo searches and newspaper searches.