Katie Finch

My feedback

  1. 154 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  2. 226 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  3. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  4. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  5. 137 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  6. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  7. 247 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  8. 78 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  9. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katie Finch commented  · 

    This would be extremely useful, strongly support this idea.

    Sometimes when Match Handling, we want to take different actions depending on the inventory on the existing record - for example, we would want to merge if there is an existing portfolio for a DIFFERENT collection (in order to create the new portfolio), but if the match is for the SAME collection we wouldn't import at all because it is just a duplicate.

    Inventory information does display when there are multi-matches, so it would be wonderful to see this extended to single matches.

    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  10. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  11. 119 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Katie Finch commented  · 

    It is the second scenario - we are purchasing additional concurrent users for an existing ebook, on the same platform. We want any additional orders to be attached to the original portfolio in this case, and the quickest and easiest way to do this would be to simply create the additional order on the portfolio in the first place (as opposed to creating the POL separately, then linking it to the portfolio as a second step). The lack of available order types prevents us from doing this.

    Katie Finch shared this idea  · 
  12. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  13. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 
  14. 175 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Katie Finch supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base