Skip to content

veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

21 results found

  1. Primo VE: Allow Exclusion of Institution Zone only records from Discovery Network/NZ Scope

    411 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    27 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commented  · 

    I strongly support - wish I had more votes to spend !

    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  2. Allow Local Fields as filters for NZ Search Scopes

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commented  · 

    I fully agree, really hope this can be realized.

  3. Request forms for Booking request and hold request in Primo VE each need their own template

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea  · 

  4. Support html in GES public notes in How to Get it section

    34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commented  · 

    I strongly support if the Idea applies to all public notes in the How to Get it section (not only for GES). Unluckily I only have 2 votes left, otherwise I would have given 3.
    We are still on Primo Classic but are preparing to switch to Primo VE. We currently use html in public notes for several use cases; it's a big issue for us that the html is not interpreted in Primo VE. See also case 00957376

    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  5. Primo VE: Ability to search by publisher (advanced search or facet)

    267 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  6. Alerts in a consortium with NZ: send alerts for records added to the inventory of the institution of the user

    101 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea  · 

  7. Make separate resource types for Manuscripts and Archival materials in CDI

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea  · 

  8. Review content type in Primo is confusing

    144 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Under Review  ·  16 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commented  · 

    Although I previously supported the idea that it is better to have just one resource type “Book Review” than two different types mixed in the facet “Reviews”, I now agree with Katrine.
    I got complaints of teaching staff that students can no longer filter on Review Articles. Their practice was to filter on “Peer reviewed” and “Reviews” in order to limit on Review articles. In certain disciplines, students that need to find information on a topic that is new for them, should start with a review article. Now, too many results are found.
    A teacher let me know that she would now advice her students to start their search in other databases, where they can filter on Review articles.
    That's a pitty.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commented  · 

    I voted for this idea because I find it confusing and misleading hat two very different contents like review articles and book reviews are in the same facet.
    If the issue can be solved by limiting the "reviews" facet by Book reviews only and and put the review articles in the facet "Articles", that's also fine with me. Maybe it's even better because there are already many resource types. Too many different resource types makes the facet less usable.

    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  9. Remove CDI constant expansion of results

    749 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  10. Primo VE: Please add 773x to the index on ISSN

    104 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea  · 

  11. Primo VE: add option to mark all Display Fields for Search and Facet

    137 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  12. Primo Analytics - Ability to report on all search strings, not just Popular and Zero Results

    166 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Primo » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  13. Making the peer reviewed icon more accurate

    775 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  14. Collection Discovery display items in a list view

    60 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  15. Add books from Proquest's Oasis database to PCI

    47 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  16. Add facets into the Collection Discovery UI

    149 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea  · 

  17. Dedup and FRBR cluster monitoring

    37 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commented  · 

    Indeed Laura, thanks for submitting this!

    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  18. Target/Collection: Vakmedianet Databases (PRVIAW)

    42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  19. Authenticated "Authentication note" field

    60 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea  · 

  20. Allow for consistant customizations in the new UI

    207 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Integration with other systems  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)